Lars Wirzenius writes:
On pe, 2010-08-20 at 14:55 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Now, I've no idea if the above would be appropriate for the upstream
front desk or not. I leave it up to you to decide whether it's worth
trying or not.
I think a debian-upstre...@lists.debian.org mailing
Jan Dittberner writes:
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:57:12PM +0200, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
On 07/02/2010 11:14 PM, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Am I the only one who has trouble -and getting laughed at- whenever I
try to explain these to potential contributors?
Can we _at least_ rename the NM
Steve McIntyre lea...@debian.org writes:
4 Marketing stuff:
a box(es) of equipment to take to stands at various shows and
expos. Might be useful, but could be expensive. Where do we store
it/them? Who organises shipping?
I think this is something which we should pursue. I
Quoting Александр Боровский xrumyc...@mail.ru:
здравствуйте вы не моглибы прислать мне список оранизаций
которыерабоаютна linux debian
translating from russian:
Hello, could you please send me a list of organizations using Debian?
the answer is:
http://www.debian.org/users/
--
To
On Wed, Jul 29 2009, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Sune Vuorela (nos...@vuorela.dk) wrote:
I'm hoping that we can convince the release team to change their mind.
I doubt you can, and I hope you don't. It could have been announced
better, but in general I think it's a good thing for Debian.
Hi,
Every organisation can only survive (or grow) with a constant stream of
fresh members.
This is obviously true.
So please dear Debian Developers: Go to http://mentors.debian.net! There
are people willing to get involved in Debian. But some of them might be in
danger to get frustrated
On Tue Jun 23 11:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- the NM process could be reduced to 5 to 10 questions choosen by the
AM amongst the 50+ questions currently in the NM templates, to verify
that the applicant has some knowledge about different aspects of Debian
packaging. Then the AM would
On Monday 05 January 2009 12:17:42 MJ Ray wrote:
--cut--
There are already crude mechanisms (reply privately, reply publicly,
report abuse and so on) but they are social more than technical.
Agruably, these mechanisms don't reveal the big picture to the society (i.e.
what people think about
On Monday 22 December 2008 07:47:41 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
So, are there going to be guide;lines for this voting on emails?
I'm afraid that I'm not able answer such a question, but I can try to provide
a contra-argument (just to prove it wrong or maybe right) -- if we follow
On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:28:18 Okan Demir wrote:
Hello,
I'm an engineering student from Turkey. I started to use Debian (Etch)
nearly one year ago. I think this period is enough to be a fan of
Debian. From now on i'm a Debian user.
But being a user, does not satisfy my Debian based
On Sunday 21 December 2008 23:12:08 Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:35:14AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
Now, I know that for a bunch of geeks like us it is very tempting to
start discussing the technical details and how the scoring is
going to be implemented, and how the
On Saturday 20 December 2008 21:33:27 MJ Ray wrote:
Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote: [...]
So, what can we do about? During a little brainstorming session on IRC
last night a following idea has emerged: let's have a way to express
our opinion about the mailing list posts. [...]
So,
On Sunday 21 December 2008 03:49:44 Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:35:14AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
* Vocal minority dominates silent majority by contributing a
disproportionate amount of list traffic, [...]
Note that voting can have a similar drawback -- in that if
On Friday 05 December 2008 23:34:41 Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-12-06 01:58:59, schrieb Chris Bannister:
Note: I employ only women (IT and Electronic)
And so is that!
Both illegal in New Zealand and hopefully, nearly(?) all other
countries.
Even if it is a project from the
On Monday 01 December 2008 15:42:20 Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:05:07PM +, Mark Brown a écrit :
FWIW similar issues apply in most of Europe too.
Thank you for the information. For Antartica, the situation of
discrimination has rapidly and positively evolved and I am
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
In this particular case, the problem is much worse than just a single
bug in a package - it's a total failure in the sponsorship
system.
From what Ramakrishnan and other sponsors wrote on this thread, it
sounds like
On Saturday 24 March 2007 19:53, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the fact that other Debian maintainers does not try to
find a workaround for the problems caused by some outcasts
causes damage to the reputation of the Debian project.
I guess
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 13:18, Martin Schulze wrote:
Jérôme Marant wrote:
It's not Dunc Tank's fault if your jealous.
Hmm, maybe it is because the developer is jealous on/of somebody
being directly or indirectly paid by the project while they are
not?
My personal belief
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 13:09, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 04:16, Matej Cepl wrote:
Paul Belanger wrote:
After all, the point of any distribution is to sell it to a user.
It is not. For example, Debian Developers usually don't care how many
users is Debian
On Saturday 02 September 2006 02:41, Russ Allbery wrote:
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The reason I am pushing for this is because of two of my clients, who
have been wanting to use Debian for three years now but consciously
decided against it, because it is not guaranteed that
On Monday 31 July 2006 19:46, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Hubert Chan dijo [Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:30:06AM -0400]:
I meant with group of maintainers, number of uploaders 1. Joerg
Jaspert said that he wouldn't like to be forced to team maintenance
and suggested 0day NMUs for = normal bugs with
On Sunday 30 July 2006 13:24, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:57:32PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:23:09PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
So, that's a clear example where the team maintenance can be as useless
as letting only one people
On Saturday 29 July 2006 09:48, Martin Schulze wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Co-maintainers are much closer to what is being done in a package
than joe-random developer. Also, co-maintainership is far less
prone to fire-and-forget uploads that hose things, and are nicer to
people
On Saturday 08 July 2006 12:20, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Also, they had some engine for package comparison and search (where the
weather was one of the side spin-offs from it). This could help us to
ask more question about package aspects, and they are waiting for inputs
from us to
On Sunday 11 June 2006 21:50, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You are crazy, and should get yourself some professional psychiatric
counceling.
I fully agree that this creature [1] has some kind of mental problems, thus
trying to keep any sort of normal conversaton with such sort of interlocutors
is
On Saturday 10 June 2006 19:01, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.10.1748 +0200]:
yahoo reported to have killed the account to me this morning.
Funny, when I forwarded the email to abuse@ last night, they replied:
Please know that
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 16:14, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 02:29:56PM +0300, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 10:15:20PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Besides, there is no value in a wide-open voting system. This is
called an Internet poll and the
On Saturday 15 April 2006 17:48, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
--cut--
We'll never tell that! We just tell we trust you to maintain x
according to our standards but since you didn't went (yet) through
full NM, we don't trust you on working on anything you'd want.
Err, I am not sure we do
28 matches
Mail list logo
