Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is actually the fourth draft, but wanted to polish it a bit before
> everyone got to see it:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~willy/dfdocg-0.4.txt
Nice piece of work, thanks!
...
> I expect controversy over section 4 primarily with perhaps minor com
Quoting Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:05:07AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > But we *can* make people happy in this respect. It's possible for the
> > GFDL to achieve its goal without preventing this use case.
>
> I remain unconvinced that the freedoms require
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Isn't a public mailing list (with public logs), but moderated to
> @debian.org posters, a possible solution to the current misuse of
> debian-private?
Why the hell spending one's precious time with such metaphysical
questions?
In any case, co
Quoting Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:29:45PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Also, we don't have any pseudo package for edge or release management
> > stuff yet,
>
> Eeek, it's 'etch' :P
Bless you.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1426 +0100]:
>> Why wouldn't they get a _Debian membership_ status like any other
>> contributor? Isn't it unfair not to do so?
>
> Every additional member with write access to the archive is an
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't get it. Do you have a concrete example that makes this necessary?
>> It seems more and more difficult to become member of Debian, which is
>> after all a volonteer-only project. Why trying to more and more discourage
>> people to contribu
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1320 +0100]:
>> What about translators? Isn't it time to give them a real status?
>> They definitely aren't second-class contributors.
>
> They do not need developer status, do they? They should
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What about translators? Isn't it time to give them a real status?
>> They definitely aren't second-class contributors.
>
> Looking at Frans, this seems to work. My experience (also as AM) is that
> people who join Debian with another core task than main
(CC'ing -project as well)
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
Here are few comments/questions.
> following the various "Bits from $foo" this is a small mail to summarize
> whats up with "the DAMs".
[...]
> 1. Introduction of the new DAM member
> -
9 matches
Mail list logo
