-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
To any press/general public type folks who might be reading this: this
mail is mostly aimed at developers - you might want to read Joey's
post[1] on debian-news instead.
ure of
the team a little more, to make it a little clearer whom to ask about
what[1]. The responsibilities are, roughly, divided like so:
FTP Master: (overall care of the archive)
James Troup
Ryan Murray
Anthony Towns
FTP Assistants:
Randall Donald (NEW processing)
D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As many of you will have already noticed merkel is suffering from
problems. Dann Frazier, the local admin, spent several hours working
on it last night trying to get it working again without success. At
the moment, we're assuming the problem is
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh well... there are people interested:
There are people subscribed; there's a difference. Take the i386
lists for example, there's 360 people subscribed, sure, but there's
also zero traffic. No one uses the i386 lists. Anyway, whatever, I'm
not par
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are also architectures for which there is no debian-*-changes
> list (such as s390). I think the idea has merit, and the buildd's
> should be fixed to send their messages to the appropriate list.
No, that's harking back to the ridiculous situati
I don't have time for this BS; I'm off to London in a couple of hours
to watch the end of the world, and I won't have net access there, so
if I don't reply for a while that's why.
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I didn't "stage a walkout"; I quit. I've had nothing to do with
> > new
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As for naming names, it's a matter of accountability. Yes, NM is
> messed up. Now we need to make sure NM doesn't get messed up again,
> and to do that we need people in NM we can trust not to stage a
> walkout when their perception of the project (as
7 matches
Mail list logo
