Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

t; there are so many examples of folks willing to show their face. > Perhaps it might occur to you that would be applicants read the procedures before applying. Those who would refuse do soby not applying. (Use me as an example.) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Ziegler) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 04:05:06PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote: > It comes down to: Can you do "normal" things that may be required by the > task at hand? Scanning a passport seems to be a reasonable skill to > require of incoming members. Isn't it? > > >

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

me to match well with the spirit of the new maintainer web page I first read a year or two ago. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Ziegler) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

and Ritchie, they had no scanners so could not have had anything to contribute. (Please be sure to note that this is a comment on the arrogance of the assumption that one who does not have convienent access to the latest technology cannot have anything of value to contribute.) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

send me the money to buy one..... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Ziegler) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]