Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the Debian mailing list archives and you will find some of the related
personal atacks.
I asked for references, but you seem not to be able to give me ANY of
them, just telling me look in the archive. So you seem not to be able
to give me
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
There is a reason why I do not waste my time with people on a Debian
list
One wonders why you even bothered to send your original mail to us,
then. I believe we'd all appreciate it if you stopped wast
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are not talking about a notable contribution but about a notable
damage to FLOSS caused by people who are unwilling to cooperate in a useful
way.
Joerg, as a piece of friendly advice, I think it would be wise to drop
it. You continue
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that the license change was definitely not the reason for the fork
(the
fork would have been done in a different way if the license change was the
reason).
And again wrong, your license change *IS* the reason, we simply do not
accept
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 16:40:34 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Also note that I am not attacking people but only trying to inform about
the
truth while Mr. Bloch is constantly publishing personal attacks.
Please point us to those. I
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the fact that other Debian maintainers does not try to
find a workaround for the problems caused by some outcasts
causes damage to the reputation of the Debian project.
I guess you missed Aurelien's mail [0]? What about the other
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you missed Aurelien's mail [0]? What about the other distros?
Mail not addressed to me is send py people who are not interested
in an answer from me.
The Code of Conduct for the Debian lists indicates that CCs are to be
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10968 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
There is no need to refute obviously wrong claims from Mr. Bloch.
If you believe his wrong claims, it seems that I cannot help you anyway.
As you always and only hit on Eduard - does that mean my claims
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10968 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Or does you not answering the arguments in my mails from shortly before
we did the fork simply show that you do not have anything to reply to
them, as there simply isnt anything valid against them? Instead
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not have the unlimited time to waste with useless speudo
discussions. I am sorry, but this will be the last response to you
unless you start to open your mind to the reality.
For the same reason. this reply is shortened.
- dozens of unfixed
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The GPL is known to be asymmetric (which is a problem) and even the founder
of Debian does not follow your strange ideas on interpreting the GPL.
http://ianmurdock.com/?p=278
(see 3rd paragraph)
Umm, Ian Murdock had a problem with
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked you to point me to those published personal attacks and i did
not ask you about your personal opinion about Mr. Bloch.
Read what i wrote you, and then speak again!
As Mr. Schilling answered all the other mails in this thread but
12 matches
Mail list logo
