Re: Debian acronymns (was:Re: A policy on use of AI-generated content in Debian)

2024-05-06 Thread Judit Foglszinger
Hi, > It would be helpful if Debian would create (and keep up-to-date) a web > page of acronymns and abbreviations used by Debian literati. Or is there > already such a one, but not listed on the site map? There is one in the wiki - https://wiki.debian.org/Glossary signature.asc Description:

Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?

2022-11-20 Thread Judit Foglszinger
Hi, > This does raise the wider question: we're about to freeze for Bookworm. > Removing leaf packages and packages with a small user count might be > profitable > at this point. Fortune-mod has some bugs at the moment preventing testing > transition and has had several NMUs prior to the latest

Re: Realizing Good Ideas with Debian Money

2019-06-01 Thread Judit Foglszinger
> But yes, it's entirely possible that I'm being too cautious. I'd say, being cautious in this case is very warranted. One of the things, that are good about Debian is, that it's _not_ cooperate. "You will not work for free for a company. Debian is not a company." Throwing in money has a high

Re: metaphors and feminism

2019-03-30 Thread Judit Foglszinger
> I see other people doing this too.  I like it. > > The problem of course is that the official term is not "member" so > this is unclear and arguably wrong in some sense.  It should be.  I > would second a GR to change it. While I would agree with the phrase "DDs are full Debian members", I