> That is the message I am using now. I don't think it leaves much room for
> confusing non-free and Debian.
On the contrary, it reads like a very *weak* separation. Suppose instead:
> Debian makes available some non-free software. Though this software is
> not part of Debian proper, it can be
I also find it *very* useful to have doc-rfc and doc-iana. I'd keep
fortune-data out of tradition. On the other hand, I'd ditch all of
the linux magazines (lg, pluto, I think there are others?) without a
second thought...
I'd argue that doc-rfc has sort of the same niche as doc-HOWTO. Not
sure
2 matches
Mail list logo
