Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-08-09 Thread Mats Wichmann
Jeff Licquia wrote: On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: How about the init-scripts? Does LSB say anything about them, or is that a rather optional component? Yes, I had forgotten those; there were conventions in 1.3, but they have changed slightly since then.

Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-08-08 Thread Mats Wichmann
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:28:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: What does the LSB 3.1 say about amd64 and libdirs? Does it require lib to contain 32bit libs? Does this same question apply to other 64bit a

Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch

2006-08-03 Thread Mats Wichmann
Jeff Licquia wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:53 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Jeff Licquia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060731 22:18]: These failures are common to all distributions using X.org 7. Several symbols have moved from one library to another. Would that failure also appear wi