Re: Help the DPL (DPL calling for help?)

On 04/04/2010 08:06 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 06:19 +0200, Michael Goetze wrote: On 04/02/2010 11:31 PM, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: Also, Talking to the press is very important Why? If you talk to the press they may misunderstand and misquote you but you should be able

Re: Help the DPL (DPL calling for help?)

On 04/02/2010 11:31 PM, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: Also, Talking to the press is very important Why? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: let's add news.debian.net to planet.d.o (!?)

Hi, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Since a while now, Ana has been doing a great job in providing the news.debian.net service [1]. I personally find it a very useful service in blog news style: it provides useful bit of information, it goes straight to the point, and does not post too often

Re: no smp kernel available yet ?!

Hi, I just bought a new PC (based on Intel I5 750 processor) -- it's not yet here, but it will soon. So, I looked for some multicore 64bit processors Debian portage, but founded none except ia64 with a monocore default kernel. So, I will have to compile a new kernel (with SMP support). You

Re: Debian money / Hardware certification

Hi, Jesús M. Navarro wrote: Yes. There's a kindof market point I've been wishing on Debian for years knowing that it simply could happen: certifications and generally rising attention to commercial producers, both hardware and (free/open) software. I think there's right now a thread on

Re: Results of the Lenny release GR

Robert Millan wrote: - Even if there's a general perception that everyone agrees not to delay Lenny at all costs, this should definitely be voted on and sanctioned. Not doing so creates a very bad precedent. You think everyone must be voted on? What exactly do you think these

Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions

MJ Ray wrote: to reduce GRs, having another way for developers to ask a question that nearly always gets answered might help. Such as, say, writing an email to debian-de...@ldo? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: PATCH for spamass-milter to solve Debian list spam-bounce issue (Was:- Spamming the World through Open Debian Mailinglists....)

Jeroen Massar wrote: The politics though is really nasty. Yes, I agree completely. It seems this need for people to unsubscribe (and thus not being able to participate in Debian) is quite a hard tendency. Too many people already in the project and nothing to do or something? Or didn't get