Re: LSB Compliance

2003-04-30 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 04:48:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 02:42:54PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: We _do_ plan to be LSB compliant eventually. We are, in general, very strong believers in open standards. But the LSB is not our top priority at the moment, because

Re: Debian as a social group and how to develop it better

2002-12-02 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:02:45PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:27:40PM -0800, Xavian-Anderson Macpherson wrote: Linux must be converted into a system that ABSOLUTELY NEVER needs to be rebooted for ANY reason at all. Why? What advantage is there in eliminating

Re: VA.debian.org runs LDAP now

2000-01-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Ben Collins wrote: [ snip ] : Jason has the LDAP for us setup to rsync (via ssh) a setup of passwd.db : files to each system. These files are located under /var. Using standard : LDAP for NS (with libnss_ldap) means that if that ldap server dies, logins : are disabled.