> I have the first version of Corel Linux that I want to use to start my
> adventure into using Debian, is this o.k. ? Can I install it and then
> proceed to upgrad to the latest stable Debian packages ?
While upgrading from Corel's to Debian's GNU/Linux is possible, it's not
painless. If you int
> Personally, I'm quite distressed to learn that we don't distribute the Linux
> kernel sources or any graphics applications, and have no support for
> SMP or USB ;-)
One day, in an office...
- I bet you that you can't review 9 Linux distributions in three hours...
- Want to see?
> Okay, hopefully the final language change:
>
> Proposal is to change section 2.1.5 of the Debian policy to say:
>
>Non-free programs with cryptographic program code must be stored on
>the "non-us" server because of export restrictions of the U.S.
>
>Programs which use patented algo
> > > Here is my problem: I've always disliked section "base", as being an
> > > artificial set of packages otherwise belonging to standard sections
> > > (utils, admin, etc.).
> >
> > The current idea of `Section: base' is totally broken. I brought this topic
> > twice to the lists, but was unab
> Here is my problem: I've always disliked section "base", as being an
> artificial set of packages otherwise belonging to standard sections
> (utils, admin, etc.).
The current idea of `Section: base' is totally broken. I brought this topic
twice to the lists, but was unable to "build consensus".
5 matches
Mail list logo