Floris Bruynooghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:47:49PM +0000, Rich Walker wrote:
>> Max Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
>> > and can be downloaded at intel.com/go/linux <http://intel.com/go/linux>.
>> Redirects to
>&
Max Alt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and can be downloaded at intel.com/go/linux <http://intel.com/go/linux>.
Redirects to
http://www.intel.com/cd/channel/reseller/asmo-na/eng/188931.htm
which doesn't seem relevant.
Got a better link?
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:40:23PM +0100, Rich Walker wrote:
>> In the UK, VAT registration is *required* if you are "in business"[1]
>> and your 12-month *turnover* exceeds £6. Probably this is not an
>> i
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
>> So a charity for the benefit of Debian members would not work unless
>> Debian was a charity, which it can't be for the aforementioned political
>> reason.
>
> I tho
tures/constitution.PDF&ei=5fseQ_7_OM2GwQGgopGWCw>
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487
www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml
--
To
ound saying "oh, we
claim we're not commercial because we're not trying to make a profit,
just raise some money". It would be like, oh, trying to do contract work
without a legal entity to bill through and then wondering why the taxman
wanted a lot of money from you.
cheers,
e UK, charities are *heavily regulated*. It's easier to set up a
Limited Company than a charity, and for good reason.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Actually, depending on what parts of UK law the organisation ended up
>> falling under (and without a clear constitution &c this will probably
>> *not* be what you
mbership of a non-charitable body, for example, members of a
professional institute."
then it cannot be a charity.
So a charity for the benefit of Debian members would not work unless
Debian was a charity, which it can't be for the aforementioned political
reason.
cheers, Ric
lso form a Co-operative, owned by its members and not
necessarily expected to make a profit.
Businesses trade as any of these happily.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1
nd
> business for you, or is it not ?
If you sell stuff in the UK, then tax law applies to you *regardless* of
volume.
There are *exemptions* in the tax law, but "we're doing a good thing"
isn't one of them.
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [E
al
shenanigans seems about as sensible as having code without licenses in
Main.
cheers, Rich
>
> --
> Henning Makholm "`Update' isn't a bad word; in the right setting it is
> useful. In the wrong setting, though, it is destructive...&qu
the right to
> vote in the first place? Sheesh.
Under non-UK law this argument might be relevant.
Under UK law, as a member of an association without a legally-structured
constitution, you have potentially *become vulnerable* to any legal
penalty levied at the organisation.
[snip]
Footnotes:
[1] By
ists. I have nothing against either of these population
groups - but is it essential that DD's come only from these two small
pools of the wider competent population?
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Roa
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 01:00:28AM +0100, Rich Walker wrote:
>> Why should Debian *advertise* the services of someone who will not
>> return the favour?
>
> Why should a consultant be *forced* to advertise for Debian in order
im Header
> Mannheim, Germany | lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
> Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
>
>
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool R
eing closed, or
> the bug will be archived and then a new RFP bug needs to opened
> instead.
>
> Suggestions for improvements are welcome.
>
>
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a
17 matches
Mail list logo
