You can shorten the lines of choices 3 & 5 and send the email through
GMail. See your sent messages as to where the wrap happened.
Best,
Richard
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:48 AM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I have the very highest regard for both Joerg's and Enrico's integrity. I
> hope that they would say likewise about me. We are trying hard to do the
> right thing and not the subvertible thing, so please have a little faith
> that we
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 11:27 AM Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
[...]
> Anthony Towns:
[...]
> > Having the boss's decision reviewed by people who report directly to
> > the boss is kind of a dodgy structure; and people on the new member
> > committee will probably want to maintain good relations with DAM,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:46 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I don't intend to use devotee for that. I don't think it can
> currently handle such votes, nor do I want to spend time
> implementing that.
I have used CIVS[1] for various projects and for work. It's not very
polished, but usually works well.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Richard Hartmann
richih.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
* WANAL, but as we understand it the current situation already gives
us a legal standing if we need it
I have been asked to clarify.
Long-term use gives us protection under Common Law. This is harder
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
The debian swirl is trademarked, but freely licensed.
I don't think so:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=docstate=4803:q33o33.2.1
The mark consists of a
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote:
So the plan is that the beatings will continue until morale improves?
Interpretation is in the eye of the bee holder, but I am considering
to attach this list to my weekly bug report; mainly because I can.
Richard
PS: If not
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to ask these people privately what is getting in
the way of a switch to a stronger key?
That seems to have happened in similar form a few times already; given
the context, it's
Dear all,
is there anything more I can (or need to) do?
Thanks,
RIchard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
the member count to the functional
minimum; changes in intent away from Debian's best interest are thus
virtually impossible.
The founding members are:
* Michael Banck
* Rene Engelhard
* Richard Hartmann (chairman of the board)
* Philipp Hug
* Jörg Jaspert (vice chairman)
* Martin Krafft (treasurer
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
As you already described how you met the TO criteria in
cad77+gqwz0opgzi2qsgre3y3vbungtg6b4beqtcqbrz-wjh...@mail.gmail.com,
I think that we can safely say that the minimum two weeks discussion
period started on 2014-04-26
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
The last step was never used so far AFAIK.
But it could probably be implemented as a d-d-a email providing the updated
list of TOs, and a page on the Debian website listing TOs and referencing
the d-d-a email.
(Similar
Dear all,
as announced some time ago, we will incorporate DebConfDeutschland
e.V. tomorrow.
All founding members will be DDs with the full list being sent as a
reply to this email after the fact.
Given that:
* We will not be using the name Debian
* We are not planning to run for more than
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
So I'm not against considering the idea of keep the DC15 TO after DC15,
but this will clearly have to be weighted against the disadvantages of
this option.
We decided to go with a single-use eV for DebConf15, because:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
I personally think that this could be enough, but would welcome more
opinions on that.
Same and same.
We would appreciate more feedback on this (and on when silence will be
interpreted as implicit consensus).
Richard
Engelhard
Richard Hartmann
Sandro Knaus
Unconfirmed attendance:
Constanze Stohn
Philipp Hug
Sebastian Harl
2. The organization should remain loyal to Debian
See 1.
Going against Debian's best interest now or in the future would not
only be stupid beyond description, it would also wipe out our
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org wrote:
I'm running some throw-away non-profit organisations, and have not
experienced problems.
Have the tax authorities been made aware of this in advance? For how
long are those organisations running?
Debconf has a different
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this kind of reports is useful (probably one can find
many such things just with a few searches in your favourite engine, so
isolate reports like this are not very interesting?); or
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
A google search for:
debian it
results in this link as the top hit. I'm cc'ing trademarks.
JFTR, it's the fourth hit for me, but Google's filter bubble is a
filter bubble..
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Brian Gupta brian.gu...@brandorr.com wrote:
4) What is the impact of registering in the US only?
A: We would still only have Common law protection in those countries
we don't register the logo. We'd gain no benefit in those
jurisdictions, but it wouldn't hurt
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 18:09, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
So a short reply (I'll post this to d-d-a with reply-to
set to -project) will be very much appreciated! :)
Same as Martin James.
I know I can skip Debian talks if they clash with other stuff as I know
the room
21 matches
Mail list logo
