On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 17:04, Richard Stallman wrote:
> to consider the sexrecy of the nvidia instruction set as a violation
> of competition law.
Who ever says that?
Best regards, R-
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 20:09, Richard Bostrom
wrote:
>
> Your Operating System is Wonderful.
> Thank you for providing Nvidia Drivers.
>
Dear Mr. Richardh Bostrom
You are right! Imagine for a moment what would happen if the Linux
kernel community and the Debian community decide to not support
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 04:44, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > I do not know
On Sat, 4 Mar 2023 at 05:16, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
Dear Richard,
I do
dy, even an internal inspection can find them and verify
that all the rights have been properly and legally transferred. Again,
this would not change the world but acknowledge developers about their
rights. Education is as important as influencing as much ruling in
court, especially in op
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 19:23, Roberto A. Foglietta
wrote:
> Everyone that has a kind of urgency about doing business can employ me
> and I will set up a near-complete solution for them that I did not
> explain to everyone
The "near-complete" does not mean that it is work-in
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 15:36, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Roberto" == Roberto A Foglietta writes:
>
> Roberto> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 19:08, Russ Allbery
> wrote:
> >>
> >> No. It's entirely possible that using databa
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 08:33, Roberto A. Foglietta
wrote:
>
One more thing about this following:
>
> 2. if an author does not exercise a right for a long period of time
> enforcing it then that right is lost for the principle of "usucapio"
> in latin
The &
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 06:31, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-02-27 at 01:45 +0100, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
>
> > Because the principle of the copyright existence is about protecting
> > the authors' exclusive of that {business, commercial, marketing}
> &
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 19:08, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> No. It's entirely possible that using databases as training sets for an
> AI/ML engine is fair use under existing United States law and precedent as
> long as that use is sufficiently transformative (the first factor of the
> test, and I
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 08:50, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> "Roberto A. Foglietta" writes:
>
> > A totally automatic procedure like web crawling and web indexing
> > re-enter in your example, perfectly. However, the input collection that
> > a ML/AI training syste
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 08:38, Roberto A. Foglietta
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 07:16, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > "Roberto A. Foglietta" writes:
> >
[...]
>
> No court ruling was ever emitted in favour of Google vs Oracle
> leveraging fair
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 07:16, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> "Roberto A. Foglietta" writes:
>
> > - fair use cannot include {business, commercial, marketing} rights in
> > anyway and in any conditions
>
> This is definitely not true in the United States; there
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 21:47, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> "Roberto A. Foglietta" writes:
>
> > My proposal to apply the GPLv3 or AGPLv3 - not directly to an object
> > but - to a collection of objects using the database protection,
> > automatically also sol
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 21:47, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> I am not a lawyer, let alone a copyright lawyer, and have only an amateur
> Internet understanding of the nature of compilation copyrights (and they
> may well also vary by jurisdiction), but my understanding (possibly
> incorrect) of the law
better to declare explicitly what is not "fair use". Otherwise, we
risk having to explain this in court. Like in this file header:
https://github.com/robang74/isar/blob/evo2/meta/recipes-support/expand-on-first-boot/files/expand-last-partition.sh
# (C) 2022, Roberto A. Foglietta
# SPDX-License-Id
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 09:09, Roberto A. Foglietta
wrote:
>
ERRATA CORRIGE
> I hope this helps to acknowledge and convince us - as the open-source
> and software-libre community - about the great responsabilitiy that is
> a burden on our shoulders. Such a responsibility cannot
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 01:03, Roberto A. Foglietta
wrote:
>
About this in the following I wish to add a link to a very interesting
article that I found and which expresses a reasonable concern about
the mass adoption of a potentially manipulative technology like A.I.
can be. And proba
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 10:27, Gerardo Ballabio
wrote:
>
> If I am not mistaken, the GPLv3 was developed to clarify some
> ambiguous language in the GPLv2, mostly with respect to patents. It
> doesn't address SaaS -- you are still free to modify the code and keep
> your modifications private, even
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 08:06, Roberto A. Foglietta
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 05:23, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
One more thing about this:
> - Joe tests the NN with the 10+1 images of TS and decides if the NN is
> fine or not. If he decides that it is fine and it can go
ut this new way of using the GPLv3, will be shared here or
everywhere I decide to share it. So, if you are under NDA, I am not
and thus do not write/talk to me or otherwise do it at your own risk. :-)
I hope this helps,
--
Roberto A. Foglietta
+49.176.274.75.661
+39.349.33.30.697
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 00:16, M. Zhou wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Recap:
> The modern practice of AI has blurred the boundary between the code and data,
> which leads to some potential ambiguity to the interpretation of the
> definition of
> open source as well as the respective licenses. Such
Hi all,
an Italian article which is important to read and possibly an urgent
matter to address.
https://www.ilsoftware.it/articoli.asp?tag=La-legge-europea-sul-controllo-delle-chat-potrebbe-bloccare-il-funzionamento-dei-sistemi-operativi-open-source_25561
GOOGLE TRANSLATION
The European chat
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 at 12:57, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 12:27 PM Roberto A. Foglietta
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 18:04, Roberto A. Foglietta
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > today, I have
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 18:04, Roberto A. Foglietta
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> today, I have published this project which aims to deliver some
> advanced functions for git and also a lot of smart shortcuts for the
> most frequently used git commands. I hope you will like it a
Hi all,
today, I have published this project which aims to deliver some
advanced functions for git and also a lot of smart shortcuts for the
most frequently used git commands. I hope you will like it and
possibly also contribute to its future development with your feedback.
At the moment, the
Il Lun 19 Dic 2022, 20:48 Nicholas Hubbard ha
scritto:
> Hey, I wrote a script to download the .debian.tar.xz file for every
> package on packages.debian.org. I was running the script and all of a
> sudden it stopped working, and I am now unable to access
> packages.debian.org from my home IP.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 18:40, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> Andrew M.A. Cater dijo [Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 07:33:53AM +]:
> > (...)
> > The utility of a separate package depends on how much work it is to
> > produce it. That was the renaming bug that jmtd fixed, I think.
> > I think removing
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 23:56, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:18:48AM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > "Roberto A. Foglietta" wrote on 20/11/2022 at
> > 22:14:35+0100:
> >
> > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:42, G. Branden Ro
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 00:59, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:07:53AM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> >Am 20. November 2022 23:04:05 MEZ schrieb Mattia Rizzolo :
> >>On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> >>> On 11/
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 21:42, G. Branden Robinson
wrote:
> Thank you for, perhaps inadvertently, compelling me to review some of
> the content of the package. I can now say that I am certain there is
> material of worth in the fortunes-off package and support its retention
> in the Debian
Dear all,
I am proud to announce the v0.9.2 of an ISAR evaluation nVidia image
generator based on Debian bullseye. I hardly believe that this project
will surprise you because of the technology adopted nor its use but
probably you will find this file interesting, in particular the
rationale
32 matches
Mail list logo
