On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:50:00AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> eg love.debian.net was great (why is it down?). and so are/were
> others, please
If only the username was encoded in that host we'd all know who to ask... ;)
Simon.
--
* "A l'attaque par Junon" "Aoh! Choquant. Ce ne sont pas d
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:59:08AM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 03:31:45AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > If you don't want to deal with the occasional spam that gets through,
> > then feel free to unsubscribe. Furthemore, the thresholds for
> >
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 03:31:45AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > And having to sign up every once in a while to a Debian list is
> > really annoying because you get kicked off because you are
> > forwarding spam.
> If you don't want to deal with the occ
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:15:58AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Instead, you seem to be saying, "how could anyone be so stupid as to use
> > a non-symbolic name?" when nobody is actually being that stupid. We're
> > just using the symbolic name we were told to use the last time the names
> > we
[honouring m-f-t]
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:35:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:15:12PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:22:58PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Anthony Towns writes ("Two GR concepts for dicussion
load. But developers upload broken packages occasionally
too. I don't think we should restrict this based on the possibility
that people will break something.
As a developer you have to try to exercise good judgement and as a
maintainer you would have to too.
--
Simon Huggin
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:22:58PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes ("Two GR concepts for dicussion"):
> > I think the process should involve:
> > [...]
> This sounds like a good idea to me.
> One thing that would be really helpful would be an ability for a
> Maintainer of this kin
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:37:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> First, the "Debian Maintainers" concept
> [..]
> I think the process should involve:
> - automated application process
This shouldn't be tricky.
Some webpage where the applicant applies and then they point some developers
at a
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:37:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> First, the "Debian Maintainers" concept
[..]
> My best summary of Joerg's objections are:
[..]
> - it's taking over some of the DAM role (in principle if not
> precisely in practice) so should be done with DAM's approval
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 04:26:15PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Well, I'm still not sure wether DM is a good thing or not in fact. But
> I'd say it has te be experimented yes. If we are going that road, Then
> I've two people to recommend for this: Fathi and Yves-Alexis Perez that
> is our one
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 02:22:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
> > Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
> > really responsive.
> So apparently this
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:17:45PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > 1. Fix scott's patch repository: Ubuntu needs to keep a copy of the
> > original Debian source package used to create their packages so that
> > Ubuntu can always generate a useful pat
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 11:52:00AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 07:27 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Try asking: how hard is it for project funds to be used to pay
> > someone's entire personal mobile phone bill, what would need to
> > be disclosed to project supporters and has i
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:41:35AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I'm in favour as well.
> I wonder, do you and the other "me too" people also have a reason to
> justify switching?
I'm in favour of moving irc.debian.org just as I was last time this came
up because of Rob
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:03:10PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Applicants with fast/free internet connections, local mirrors and so
> on can do the bookwork needed for the template questions without much
> pain. A lot of the questions repeatedly confirm an ability to look
> stuff up and restate it, tes
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:43:14PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:05:27PM +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> > Ai, any chance of getting a copy of msgid.php et al. so that
> > somebody can run it elsewhere?
> Here. It still needs some work - the php frontend does not hand
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:17:34PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's just a more formal, more accountable situation than what was
> > happening before when Steve shoved Debian money into a shoebox under his
> > bed.
> Is it
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:01:12AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Scripsit MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Well, there's a BIG similarity:
> > > * both took the debian name for business use without consent;
> > You are pretty much the only one who as
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:22:33PM -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> Again, for those who are reading in a hurry:
> As of 10 May 2005, when I find myself blacklisted when sending mail as
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], I fall back to a host that is not blacklisted.
Great news. Th
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:42:30AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:30:14PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > I'd like to think Branden would fix his mail setup for leader@ (or
> > best get his ISP to remove his IP from the DUL or provide one which
> &
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:10:54AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:02:26 +0100, Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Sure, not with his maintainer hat on, not with his personal hat on,
> > but when you're in a role and posting from a role
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 03:49:04PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Blacklisting based on dial-up or dynamic status is nothing more than
> an effort to turn the internet into an oligarchy, where only the rich
> and powerful can control mail. It's a power grab. That's all it does
> and all it's inten
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 04:35:31PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:35:50PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
> > 1) The Internet is peer-to-peer. You want to break that?
> > 2) Some of the ISPs I've used refuse to relay my messages when they
> > claim to be from my dropbear address
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 02:53:21AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday June 19 2005 2:31 am, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > You can see on your "blacklist backlash" that JaNET, the UK's
> > academic network is listed as respecting the DUL. Blacklisting via
> >
Hi all,
I originally sent this mail to:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i.e. Leader and Project SCUD
I've not had any form of reply though and feel this is a
25 matches
Mail list logo
