On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:36:45AM +,
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 43 lines which said:
> > An arm buildd maintainer not reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] is simply not
> > doing his job as buildd maintainer.
>
> Please show where reading everything on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
> given
On Sunday 28 March 2004, at 23 h 35,
naziya shaik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we have downloaded your netkit-inetd which includes...inetd plus other
> documents
>
> in inetd...we got " inetd.c,pathnames.h,inetd.h.files"
The Debian operating system provides everything as binaries (sou
On Monday 29 March 2004, at 5 h 24,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) wrote:
> Or perhaps they are simply a loud and annoying minority, which is what I
> suspect.
Minorities are always annoying.
On Sunday 14 March 2004, at 17 h 27,
Konstantinos Kopanias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It allows writing and reading texts in ancient languages (so
> far ancient greek and coptic), and also the sending and receiving of
> Emails written in such languages.
This is certainly very useful but I wo
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich hoffe, dass mein Anliegen in dieser Mailingliste richtig aufgehoben
ist.
Derzeit evaluieren wir im Auftrag der OBI Bau- und Heimwerkermärkte Linux
als Desktopbetriebssystem auf ca. 12.000 Clients in 500 OBI Märkten in 12
Ländern. Da wir bereits positive Erfah
On Friday 26 September 2003, at 14 h 23,
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Compare:
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20021128102620/http://www.gnu.org/links/links.ht=
> ml
>
> with:
[ http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html ]
Funny, FSF does not mention Debian or FreeBSD anymore, but it
Comment réagissez vous face à l'imminence de la déferlante TCPA/Palladium ?
A priori Linux en général risque d'être une des nombreuses victimes de
ce projet ... effrayant !
On Monday 4 September 2000, at 21 h 25, the keyboard of John Leuner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's interesting that you if can run a Java "binary" you'll also be able
> to build the sources very easily. This is because Java is always linked at
> run time, so the build-time and run-time depend
On Monday 4 September 2000, at 2 h 22, the keyboard of Matt Zimmerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it acceptable to use the upstream binary tarball as the .orig for a Debian
> source package, as it is architecture-independent? Or must it compile from
> the
> Java source?
If the package is in '
On Wednesday 26 July 2000, at 12 h 57, the keyboard of Marcus Brinkmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the processing queue is about 200 while the number of Application Managers
> > is only about 30. We need more and more Application Managers now.
>
> I prophecised this in my critique as well
[This is not private, please no longer copy debian-private in replies.]
On Monday 28 February 2000, at 16 h 3, the keyboard of Andreas Tille
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you or one of the other developers from France tell
> something about
>
> http://www.senat.fr/grp/rdse/page/forum
On Thursday 18 November 1999, at 22 h 6, the keyboard of John Goerzen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is no mere political thing as you try to make it. What you and
> others are trying to do is, in my opinion, seriously damaging to the
> Free Software community. ...
> Let's stamp out the BSD
12 matches
Mail list logo
