Re: "gr_rms" worked with mutt+gpg+ssh+sendmail (Evolution is difficult)

Hi, On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 23:46 +, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:48 PM Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > Evolution PGP sign seems fragile and it doesn't work > > I signed my vote using Evolution's OpenPGP support and it worked fine for me. > > > (Maybe I should have used S/MIME sign)

Re: "gr_rms" worked with mutt+gpg+ssh+sendmail (Evolution is difficult)

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:48 PM Osamu Aoki wrote: > Evolution PGP sign seems fragile and it doesn't work I signed my vote using Evolution's OpenPGP support and it worked fine for me. > (Maybe I should have used S/MIME sign) Debian doesn't use S/MIME signing in any context. -- bye, pabs http

Re: "gr_rms" worked with mutt+gpg+ssh+sendmail (Evolution is difficult)

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:48 PM Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi, I finally voted. > > Kurt was right. My initial confusion about UI of Evolution created > mail without signature. (Evolution signature menu is not for PGP sign) > > Also Jessica was right. Evolution PGP sign seems fragile and it > doesn't

Re: "gr_rms" worked with mutt+gpg+ssh+sendmail (Evolution is difficult)

Hi, I finally voted. Kurt was right. My initial confusion about UI of Evolution created mail without signature. (Evolution signature menu is not for PGP sign) Also Jessica was right. Evolution PGP sign seems fragile and it doesn't work (Maybe I should have used S/MIME sign) My solution -- get