* [ 14-03-05 - 21:03 ] Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-14 20:28]:
One example of how debian could help debtags being integrated is a
policy which makes the developer the responsible of tagging the packages
(s)he maintains.
Emanuele Rocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
* [ 14-03-05 - 21:03 ] Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-14 20:28]:
One example of how debian could help debtags being integrated is a
policy which makes the developer the responsible of
Op vr, 11-03-2005 te 16:55 -0300, schreef Daniel Ruoso:
One example of how debian could help debtags being integrated is a
policy which makes the developer the responsible of tagging the packages
(s)he maintains.
That sounds like a good idea, actually. Make it a policy proposal?
--
Op zo, 13-03-2005 te 23:57 +0100, schreef martin f krafft:
also sprach David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.11.1926 +0100]:
You should be using aptitude instead of apt-get, again. aptitude has the
feature that it remembers which packages it installs automatically to
satisfy
* Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-14 17:09]:
That sounds like a good idea, actually. Make it a policy proposal?
That's not how policy works, but it should probably be mentioned in
the Developer's Reference. Feel free to file a wishlist bug.
Well, I must admit that this email
[...]
Debian users will tell you that apt-get is more efficient than RPM because
RPM's dependencies are other packages, while apt-get's dependencies are
individual files.
It's actually the other way around; RPM can do dependencies on
individual files, packages, and virtual packages, while dpkg
also sprach David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.11.1926 +0100]:
You should be using aptitude instead of apt-get, again. aptitude has the
feature that it remembers which packages it installs automatically to satisfy
dependencies.
Or use deborphan to identify and remove packages that are
Moved to the proper list (I hope). Please copy Toby in your
replies as he is most probably not subscribed.
Regards,
Joey
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Open Letter to Debian Community
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:11:30 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Moved to the proper list (I hope). Please copy Toby in your
replies as he is most probably not subscribed.
Thanks Joey.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
. But Debian needs work. There needs to be
master
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
I've been reading a lot lately about how Debian Linux is better than the
Red Hat/Fedora flavor. So I went and tried two Debian based distros, Mepis
and Ubuntu. Each of them used about 1.5GB of hard drive space. Mepis used
150MB RAM, but to
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:16:02AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Specific to your response, I want to say that I did try the reverse:
apt-remove kde. While it did prevent me from seeing KDE anymore, excessive
remnants of KDE and KDE libraries were still left over. My intention was
to
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Open Letter to Debian Community
With apt-get, you have to know exactly which packages you need to make
a software system work.
Let's take MySQL for example. To make it work, you need the mysql-common,
mysql-server, and mysql
12 matches
Mail list logo
