Re: [OT] Re: [DEP5] [patch] Renaming the ‘Maintainer’ field ‘Contact’

2010-08-17 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ma, 2010-08-16 at 16:19 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > * a 24-hour moratorium on posting about DEP-5 at all That went well. Thank you everyone for giving space to breathe. > * after that is over, not discussing every possible topic at once, just > a couple at a time I've commented on two topi

Re: [OT] Re: [DEP5] [patch] Renaming the ‘Maintainer’ field ‘Contact’

2010-08-15 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ma, 2010-08-16 at 12:34 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Give me a break, please. Let's give everyone a break. DEP-5 has a long, complicated history, and various people's feelings or egos have been bruised over time. It would be good to avoid doing any more of that. The current hectic pace isn't

[OT] Re: [DEP5] [patch] Renaming the ‘Maintainer’ field ‘Contact’

2010-08-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:03:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:30:06PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I use the Contact field instead of the Maintainer field for my packages, and > > nobody commented about, and they passed through the NEW queue. > > > I therefore