> "Thomas" == Thomas Goirand writes:
Thomas> On 07/02/2018 01:14 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
>> The Debian social contract doesn't go into that much detail, to
>> explicitly require keeping bugs open because they exist in
>> practice -- but common sense and decades of precedent
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:08:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing spells things out nicely
> right at the start. I can understand tolerating hard cases with difficult
> packages, but we should not advocate a degradation of the golden standard
> because of
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 04:49:57PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 01:14 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > The Debian social contract doesn't go into that much detail, to explicitly
> > require keeping bugs open because they exist in practice -- but common sense
> > and decades of precedent
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I very much don't agree with the above. It is useless to keep bugs open
> if they are not actionable. Bugs are reminders for the maintainers of
> what they should do. If they can't do anything, then it goes on the way
> to do useful things, and it is
On 07/02/2018 01:14 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The Debian social contract doesn't go into that much detail, to explicitly
> require keeping bugs open because they exist in practice -- but common sense
> and decades of precedent do.
I very much don't agree with the above. It is useless to keep bugs
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:14 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The Debian social contract doesn't go into that much detail, to explicitly
> require keeping bugs open because they exist in practice -- but common sense
> and decades of precedent do.
>
> Or is this some new thing that we're now doing, am I
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:41:39AM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > How does that make sense? If the option is called "do X", and fails to
> > do X in some opaque circumstances, how is that not a bug? At the very
> > very least, it needs to be explained somewhere. Last I checked, there
> > was
7 matches
Mail list logo
