Re: Alternative proposal (+call for seconds): Expire 2-R members every year

2014-12-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 02:55:23PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Your scenario describes a case where a member of the TC fullfills their > voting duties, but does not otherwise really participate in TC work. > This can happen, but I don't really see a correlation between this > happening, and the

Re: Alternative proposal (+call for seconds): Expire 2-R members every year

2014-12-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/12/14 at 13:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Rationale > > - > > First, I think that there is wide agreement that a more regular > > turn-over among TC members would be a good thing. And both Stefano's > > and this p

Re: Alternative proposal (+call for seconds): Expire 2-R members every year

2014-12-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:37:30PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Rationale > - > First, I think that there is wide agreement that a more regular > turn-over among TC members would be a good thing. And both Stefano's > and this proposal aim at addressing this, by ensuring that at least 2 >

Alternative proposal (+call for seconds): Expire 2-R members every year

2014-12-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
[ Cross post -vote, -project ; M-F-T: to -vote ] Hi, I am hereby formally submitting an alternative proposal, between double-dashed lines below (formally it's an "amendment", but I don't expect Stefano to accept it, as we discussed it before). I am also calling for seconds (see below). =