So when is someone of the qmail is unacceptable because DJB's
in-practice license grant does not meet strict qualifications camp
going to write an equivalent drop-in replacement? It's not like you
can't reverse-engineer qmail and make it over without using the
substandardio library -- in fact
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 14:29, David Nicol wrote:
So when is someone of the qmail is unacceptable because DJB's
in-practice license grant does not meet strict qualifications camp
going to write an equivalent drop-in replacement?
I don't think a drop-in replacement makes much sense. Qmail
Raul == Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's bullshit, and you know it. There are over 10,000
instances in debian where we have taken software, created a patch,
applied it, and distributed the binaries.
Raul You asked the question about qmail, not about debian. I answered
Raul
Raul == Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raul On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:57:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Cost has little to do with free as the DFSG defines it, so
this is a bit of a red herring. May one distribute modified versions
of the software? May one distribute binary
That's bullshit, and you know it. There are over 10,000
instances in debian where we have taken software, created a patch,
applied it, and distributed the binaries.
You asked the question about qmail, not about debian. I answered
in that context.
--
Raul
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:17:55AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Indeed, whether you, or I, personally find qmail to be
inferior or not is only tangentially significant. The only opinion
that matters here is of the people who actually work to administer
and maintain the Debian mail
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Great! I'm glad you know about it. In fact, I'm elated. Now that you
know, please do something about it. I know you have many machines running
exim, and I've heard from others that you also run postfix on some
machines. I really don't care what
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:50:39PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
Great! I'm glad you know about it. In fact, I'm elated. Now that you
know, please do something about it. I know you have many machines running
exim, and I've heard from others that you
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:28:11PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:44:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:27AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
The subject says it all. qmail is installed on murphy.debian.org.
The first thing that
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:47:34 +,
Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:15:56AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:00:10 +,
Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian should not be using non-free software on its own
systems.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:47:27AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I'll leave more details for our listmasters to share, if they want to.
I have confidence in their judgement, and the problem IS being looked
at as the responsible individuals can find time.
I'd like to ask that someone
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:37:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 01:38:41PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I'll leave more details for our listmasters to share, if they want to.
I have confidence in their judgement, and the problem IS being looked
at as the
* Daniel Jacobowitz
| On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:24:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:47:27AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
| I'll leave more details for our listmasters to share, if they want to.
| I have confidence in their judgement, and the problem IS
On 29 Aug 2002, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
FWIW, Mailman 2.1 will be able to VERP properly. MM is used on other
small installations like sf.net, python.org and apple.com, so I
think it should be able to scale. /plug
Yes, and for a good long time sf.net at least was not larger than us and
had
Package: project
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-27
Severity: serious
Justification: violates Social Contract 1, 4, and 5 (maybe others)
The subject says it all. qmail is installed on murphy.debian.org. qmail
is non-free. Debian should not be using non-free software on its own
systems. I will
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:00:10 +,
Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian should not be using non-free software on its own
systems.
Debian Project is not FSF.
Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software
I think this Debian means the Debian distribution, not a specific
Debian machine.
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
