Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:28:51 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On 2003-12-05 17:34:47 + Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I advocated was considering the possibility of adding an
explanatory
footnote for those who do *not* have such training, outside the
formal text
in question (potentially in another document entirely, probably one
without
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:43:56AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
I don't want to debate whether there is a functional difference
because I think I will be accused of more esoteric math[s] talk and
it's not relevant. The phrasing in question here seems accurate and
clear enough that you can
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:00:44AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2003-12-04 00:52:17 + Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, I'd wonder if the most suitable answer isn't simply an
annotation
of some form, to the effect of [1] Since one can't have fractional
developers, and the rule is
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:04:22 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#210879: constitution.txt: revise odd language -- K
Developers... not integers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Looks to me like the only reasonable next step, since the user considers it
sufficiently important to ask for it to be open/wontfix (which might not be
unreasonable), and others insist that it be closed completely (which also
might not be unreasonable), is to ask... well, I'd guess the tech-ctty,
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003, Joel Baker wrote:
FWIW, while I'm not sure if I agree with the assertion that it is a
problem, I do think the submitter deserves some level of justification for
why it isn't left open/wontfix,
Because there is no problem. We need at least some real number
developers is
Your message dated Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:58:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Leave this bug closed PLEASE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 07:18:15PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
The other reason to close this report is that the doc debian
package can't itself do anything to fix this supposed flaw; it has no
authority to modify the constitution. If the constitution needs to be
changed,
Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:45:24 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line There was nothing new in the reopen message
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:05:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line There was nothing in the reopen message to demostrate a bug
exists
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
11 matches
Mail list logo
