On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:56:41AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > >Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Conflict escalation and discipline"): > >>Most of the problems being discussed right now, and in general, seem > >>to be of the sort where feelings are hurt, but harassment isn't > >>happening. The situations seem to be "A did something, and B was > >>offended, how do we get A and B to understand each other, and resolve > >>any conflict, and get A and B to collaborate in the future?". > >> > >>This implies to me that, at the least, "anti-harassment" is the wrong > >>name for a team that deals with this. > > > >That's certainly true. I thought of these ideas: > > > >all @debian.org > > trouble too vague, also negative > > behaviour seems somehow hostile, also vague > > conduct seems somehow hostile, also vague > > appeals too strongly advertises judicial function > > arbitration too strongly advertises judicial function > > upset can minimise and subjectify bad actions > > conflict very negative > > resolution too vague but at least positive > > reconciliation not attractive to complaints who want action > > dispute[s] maybe? > > mediation? >
elders used by tribes, group of elder/older, because their exprience counsel as counselor Deanna Troi from Star Trek Next Generation Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven