* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Currently:
>
> "We would like this to happen and can make it happen by donating hardware"
>
> Your proposed scenario:
>
> "We would like this to happen, and if we don't donate any hardware
> then it will happen anyway because they'll just buy the ki
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:46:20PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Debian is sustainable precisely because it operates without money. If
> > we fall into the trap of just throwing money at problems then it will
> > rapidly become the only way to solve any problem (how can we ask for
> > hardware do
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > said:
> > > > Simple, the DPL selects them. We elected him, and that indicates
> > > > that we tr
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > Simple, the DPL selects them. We elected him, and that indicates
> > > that we trust his decisions on such matters as how to spend Debian
> >
* Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > Simple, the DPL selects them. We elected him, and that indicates
> > > that we trust his decisions on such matters as ho
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Simple, the DPL selects them. We elected him, and that indicates
> > that we trust his decisions on such matters as how to spend Debian
> > funds in the best interest of
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:25:40 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:33:14 -0500, Stephen Frost
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > * Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > Well, sure, but it's something intel
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:33:14PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > And I disagree, and these are only a few things upon which we could
> > spend money, if we weren't so terribly concerned that it's a bad idea to
> > spend money and we should just save
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:33:14PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Sure, you could spend money on any of these things. But you can't
> > *justify* spending money on them, because we don't need it.
>
> And I disagree, and these are only a few things upon which we could
> spend money, if we weren't
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:33:14 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > * Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Well, sure, but it's something intelligent to do w/ a consistent
> > revenue stream that would benefit us through SPI (at
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:33:14 -0500, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Well, sure, but it's something intelligent to do w/ a consistent
> revenue stream that would benefit us through SPI (at least, imv).
>> > Additionally, Debian has funded d
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Not *entirely* sure what you mean here. As mentioned elsewhere before,
> > SPI might have some use for an accounting service at the very least.
>
> That should be done by SPI, not us.
Well, sure, but it's something intelligent to do w/ a consisten
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:08:23AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:31:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > > Do you have any suggestion as to something that'd be a consistent
> > > > revenue sour
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:31:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Do you have any suggestion as to something that'd be a consistent
> > > revenue source for Debian that you *wouldn't* be opposed to? Maybe a
> > > Debian Ma
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:31:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Do you have any suggestion as to something that'd be a consistent
> > revenue source for Debian that you *wouldn't* be opposed to? Maybe a
> > Debian Magazine (with/without ads?)? Or a subscriber-only Debia
Stephen Frost wrote:
> Do you have any suggestion as to something that'd be a consistent
> revenue source for Debian that you *wouldn't* be opposed to? Maybe a
> Debian Magazine (with/without ads?)? Or a subscriber-only Debian
> website (run by those willing to provide the content for it, obvious
16 matches
Mail list logo
