On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:33:14PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
Sure, you could spend money on any of these things. But you can't
*justify* spending money on them, because we don't need it.
And I disagree, and these are only a few things upon which we could
spend money, if we weren't so
Stephen Frost wrote:
Do you have any suggestion as to something that'd be a consistent
revenue source for Debian that you *wouldn't* be opposed to? Maybe a
Debian Magazine (with/without ads?)? Or a subscriber-only Debian
website (run by those willing to provide the content for it,
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:31:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
Do you have any suggestion as to something that'd be a consistent
revenue source for Debian that you *wouldn't* be opposed to? Maybe a
Debian Magazine
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:08:23AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:31:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
Do you have any suggestion as to something that'd be a consistent
revenue source for Debian
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Not *entirely* sure what you mean here. As mentioned elsewhere before,
SPI might have some use for an accounting service at the very least.
That should be done by SPI, not us.
Well, sure, but it's something intelligent to do w/ a consistent
5 matches
Mail list logo
