On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:53:05AM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> As the DEP is not yet in a state that it should be accepted, I don't think
> it's appropriate to ask the Policy maintainers to tie the timeline of the
> 3.9.3.0 Policy release to the DEP bugfixing.
Fair enough.
> Per my discussion
Le Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:53:05AM +0100, Steve Langasek a écrit :
>
> Per my discussion with Lars, and as indicated in his previous mail, I will
> continue to follow the DEP process on debian-project to get bugfixes applied
> to DEP5 and will ask the policy maintainers to sync with the DEP when I
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 06:34:38AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> It has been proposed that upon release of the version 3.9.3.0 of the
> debian-policy package, DEP 5 will be published somewhere on www.debian.org as
> version 1.0 of the ‘copyright-format’ specification, and I have not seen
> objecti
Scott Kitterman writes:
> [the DEP 5 document states]
> "This is not a proposal to change the policy in the short term."
>
> Is the short term over or is the presence of this statement in Debian
> Policy (git anyway) merely ironic?
Neither. DEP 5 still does not change Debian Policy in any way.
Le Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 05:54:41PM -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
> On Sunday, September 11, 2011 05:34:38 PM Charles Plessy wrote:
> ...
> > http://git.debian.org/?p=dbnpolicy/policy.git;a=blob;f=copyright-format/cop
> > yright-format.xml http://wiki.debian.org/PolicyChangesProcess
> ...
>
> "T
Scott Kitterman writes:
> "This is not a proposal to change the policy in the short term."
> Is the short term over or is the presence of this statement in Debian Policy
> (git anyway) merely ironic?
It's not in the Debian Policy. It's in the copyright format document,
which is not part of Po
On Sunday, September 11, 2011 05:34:38 PM Charles Plessy wrote:
...
> http://git.debian.org/?p=dbnpolicy/policy.git;a=blob;f=copyright-format/cop
> yright-format.xml http://wiki.debian.org/PolicyChangesProcess
...
"This is not a proposal to change the policy in the short term."
Is the short term
Le Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 09:45:18AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> I'll note, in public, that after meeting with Steve in person, and
> having had a friendly and constructive discussion about DEP5 with him,
> I'll be stepping down from an active drivership role, at least for
> a while, and Steve
I'll note, in public, that after meeting with Steve in person, and
having had a friendly and constructive discussion about DEP5 with him,
I'll be stepping down from an active drivership role, at least for
a while, and Steve will take care of getting any linguistic or other
changes that he feels sho
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.2.0
Severity: minor
Subject: [copyright-format] correct or add links to SPDX.
Dear all,
I attached a patch that corrects or adds links to the SPDX Open Source License
Registry.
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:22:15AM +0200, m...@cryptolab.net wrote:
> >
> > ht
Oh dear.
Linking to spdx.org is clearly a bad idea. We should link to
locations that are stable.
This should really be fixed in the debian-policy git, but since
any changes there are currently having massive lag time, I'll just
Cc debian-project to notify people of the problem, while we figure
ou
11 matches
Mail list logo
