On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:18:17 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Does anyone want hash comments to be allowed in debian/copyright? Are
they useful?
I don't think I've ever used (or wanted to use) them.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi writes:
The Comment field has been suggested for DEP-5.
There is a pretty clear consensus that we want it. Thus, I propose this
to be added to the section explaining fields in the header (the
paragraph with Format etc):
* **`Comment`**
*
On ke, 2010-08-25 at 14:07 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Looks fine to me, although as a very minor point I'd replace Debian
ftpmaster team with upstream, since that's the more typical case.
Fair enough. Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Le Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:57:34AM +1200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
The Comment field has been suggested for DEP-5.
There is a pretty clear consensus that we want it. Thus, I propose this
to be added to the section explaining fields in the header (the
paragraph with Format etc):
*
On to, 2010-08-26 at 09:21 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Common comments come on.
Heh.
- Will paragraphs that contain only a Comment field be valid ?
Each paragraph is either a header (Format required), file license
specification (Files required), or stand-alone license description
(License
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 06:18:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
As example of free-form comments that do not need a field, there is
extracts of the correspondance with the authors when some points need to
be confirmed,
This is a good point.
and the traditional “On Debian systems, the
6 matches
Mail list logo
