On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> - We put first the patched GCC & Glibc packages (Steve, your 2 cents :D)
> - We send an advice to the mailing-lists, we write a little "guideline"
> for new development way, telling what the developer needs (and wha
ma, 2004-09-20 kello 12:01, Tapio Lehtonen kirjoitti:
> What about calling the project "Debian even more hardened". That would
> not imply that the original Debian is somehow not secure.
Call it "Debian woody was not hard enough and sarge isn't either",
perhaps? After all, if all goes well, etch w
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:12:54PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-15 15:22]:
> > That's the reason because it's called *Debian* Hardened... and, did
> > you the comments on /.? If you did, you should know a good example
> > of another
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
:: I would go a bit further: I am not convinced the
:: project name's choice was quite adequate. The
:: slogan 'secure by default' was made by the OpenBSD
:: team mainly to assert they ship with the minimum
:: active services possible to have a working, useful,
:: usable system.
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) dijo [Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 06:45:12PM -0300]:
> I was on Alioth and on 2004.09.14, a new
> project called "Debian: Secure by Default", was
> launched.
>
> If you check the site and the mission
> statement, it looks like pretty much with you
> pourpose.
Martin Michlmayr dijo [Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:12:54PM +0100]:
> I've read the comments and maybe "hardened" is an appropriate name for
> such an effort. I don't know, and I'm aware that I'm overly
> conservative in such regards, but so far I have not seen many other
> Debian developers saying tha
Hi,
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
:: [...]
:: The idea (i repeat) is now that the packages
:: should be recompiled, passed to a temporal pool,
:: tested, and then moved to the 'main' pool,
:: without creating branches/sub-trees/brands/etc,
:: and just making all the packages, hardened,
:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 09:33:44PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> The idea (i repeat) is now that the packages should be recompiled,
> passed to a temporal pool, tested, and then moved to the 'main' pool,
> without creating branches/sub-trees/brands/etc, and just making all the
> p
Hi Martin,
El dom, 19-09-2004 a las 15:12, Martin Michlmayr escribió:
> * Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-15 15:22]:
> > That's the reason because it's called *Debian* Hardened... and, did
> > you the comments on /.? If you did, you should know a good example
> > of an
* Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-15 15:22]:
> That's the reason because it's called *Debian* Hardened... and, did
> you the comments on /.? If you did, you should know a good example
> of another distro that is currently developing something alike:
> Hardened Gentoo.
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> Yes, it will take long time to complete ALL the tree, but i have this
> idea:
> - We put first the patched GCC & Glibc packages (Steve, your 2 cents :D)
> - We send an advice to the mailing-lists, we write a lit
Hi Steve!!
El sáb, 18-09-2004 a las 00:39, Steve Kemp escribió:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:55:33PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
> wrote:
>
> > Yes.The `apt-get install hardened? was an example of something 100% easy
> > to use :D
>
> Unfortunately whilst easy to use is good the id
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:55:33PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> Yes.The `apt-get install hardened? was an example of something 100% easy
> to use :D
Unfortunately whilst easy to use is good the idea of rebuilding the
packages presented so far isn't going to be easy to setup.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
[...]
Good, at least you understand that :)
|>
|>Yes and then the program halts and gets SIGABRT. Do you not know what a
|>DoS attack is?
|>
|>[...]
|
|
| Duty of Shame ?
| OK, leaving the Fun Mode off...
|
Hi John,
El sáb, 18-09-2004 a las 00:20, John Richard Moser escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Good, at least you understand that :)
>
> |>
> |>Yes and then the program halts and gets SIGABRT. Do you not k
Hi John!
El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 21:51, John Richard Moser escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> | Hi John,
> |
> | El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 19:04, John Richard Moser escribió:
> |
> |>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
| Hi John,
|
| El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 19:04, John Richard Moser escribió:
|
|>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>
|>
|>Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
|>| Hi,
|>|
|>
|>[...]
|>
[...]
Hi John,
El vie, 17-09-2004 a las 19:04, John Richard Moser escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
>
> [...]
>
> | Debian Hardened is like Debian Junior, and the rest of subprojects.
> | *We* must provide the best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
| Hi,
|
[...]
| Debian Hardened is like Debian Junior, and the rest of subprojects.
| *We* must provide the best (and the easiest) way to harden Debian for
| advanced users, sysadmins or just people that want
Hi,
El mié, 15-09-2004 a las 09:35, Sven Luther escribió:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 04:40:53PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-08 16:26]:
> > > I want to know if i can use the trademark "Debian" on the name of a
> > > project that i
El mié, 15-09-2004 a las 02:25, Martin Michlmayr escribió:
> * Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-14 22:20]:
> > I want to see Debian Hardened as an official Debian subproject
>
> *sigh* I wasn't aware the procedure for becoming an official Debian
> subproject was to ann
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 04:40:53PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-08 16:26]:
> > I want to know if i can use the trademark "Debian" on the name of a
> > project that i've started , "Debian Hardened" which i want to see as
> > an offic
* Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-14 22:20]:
> I want to see Debian Hardened as an official Debian subproject
*sigh* I wasn't aware the procedure for becoming an official Debian
subproject was to announce the project on slashdot.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04
Hi Lorenzo, Martin, lists,
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
:: Hi Martin,
:: El mar, 14-09-2004 a las 17:40, Martin Michlmayr escribió:
* Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[2004-09-08 16:26]:
:: I want to know if i can use the trademark "Debian" on
:: th
Hi Martin,
El mar, 14-09-2004 a las 17:40, Martin Michlmayr escribió:
> * Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-08 16:26]:
> > I want to know if i can use the trademark "Debian" on the name of a
> > project that i've started , "Debian Hardened" which i want to see as
> > an
* Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-08 16:26]:
> I want to know if i can use the trademark "Debian" on the name of a
> project that i've started , "Debian Hardened" which i want to see as
> an official Debian sup-project.
I personally feel that this name has the same pro
26 matches
Mail list logo
