(No need to CC me =))
Em Ter, 2006-05-02 às 11:10 +0200, Wouter Verhelst escreveu:
I don't see it this way, and I personally do not support Professional
Certification, be it LPI or any other. I would not like to see Debian
supporting them either.
Why?
Personally, I'm not convinced of
Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An=EDbal Monsalve Salazar dijo [Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:40:49PM +1000]:
So, the NM process could then be renamed Debian Professional
Certification.
If you wish to certify somebody as willing to join endless flamewars,
to idle around in IRC and devote his time
Ottavio Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, that's a bit offensive.
1) Is there a specific Debian policy about
professional certifications?
Not as far as I know.
If not so, what's your personal opinion? Useful,
useless, good, evil?
Useless, mostly evil.
2) What
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:27:13AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
By the way, you could view debian participation as a sort of
professional certification. Some of the tasks have quite
detailed and testing requirements...
So, the NM process could then be renamed Debian Professional
Certification.
Aníbal
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar dijo [Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:40:49PM +1000]:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:27:13AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
By the way, you could view debian participation as a sort of
professional certification. Some of the tasks have quite
detailed and testing requirements...
So, the NM
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:26:50AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Ottavio Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, that's a bit offensive.
Yeah, using stupid, obviously bogus addresses is only acceptable in the
Mail-Followup-To field:
Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, using stupid, obviously bogus addresses is only acceptable in the
Mail-Followup-To field:
If your mail client acts on random non-standard headers, it's buggy.
--
MJR/slef
Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Bv sekvu
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:57:24PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Em Dom, 2006-04-30 às 13:37 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
escreveu:
Debian is a volunteer project and has neither the inclination or
capability to run professional certifications, and is not involved or
--- Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the NM process could then be renamed Debian
Professional
Certification.
I'm sorrythe my post has been inserted into the wrong
thread. Some wrong headers on my webmail, perhaps.
And I'm soory I've been interted into the 'bouncers',
I
Em Dom, 2006-04-30 às 13:37 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
escreveu:
Debian is a volunteer project and has neither the inclination or
capability to run professional certifications, and is not involved or
partnering with any other organization to provide such. This does not
prevent
I have searched though the Debian website and this
mailing list and the only reference I have found is an
old Debian News regarding the LPI. So my questions
are:
1) Is there a specific Debian policy about
professional certifications?
If not so, what's your personal opinion? Useful,
useless, good
su, 2006-04-30 kello 03:30 -0700, Ottavio Caruso kirjoitti:
I have searched though the Debian website and this
mailing list and the only reference I have found is an
old Debian News regarding the LPI. So my questions
are:
1) Is there a specific Debian policy about
professional
12 matches
Mail list logo
