Hi!
On 02.05.2010 16:45, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
the Debian Project Leader recently asked DSA in his delegation[1] to fix
a flaw in the current version of the DMUP, the fact that expulsions are
DAM's domain, and not our's.
Could you please explain, why this is a flaw?
Best regards,
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Could you please explain, why this is a flaw?
I think that I should do that, but first let me quote the Comments
section of the delegation text, as it was precisely my attempt at
explaining that:
The ability to change
Hi!
Readding IMHO relevant quote for Alexanders Question:
* Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org [2010-05-03 10:45:59 CEST]:
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
On 02.05.2010 16:45, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
the Debian Project Leader recently
On May 3, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Readding IMHO relevant quote for Alexanders Question:
* Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org [2010-05-03 10:45:59 CEST]:
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
On 02.05.2010 16:45, Martin
This one time, at band camp, Jeremiah Foster said:
So it seems like there are two processes here; expulsion and deletion.
Expulsion is a political process, deletion is a technical process. One
entity may have authority over the expulsion and another over the
deletion. Am I right in assuming
Hi,
On Mon May 03, 2010 at 10:14:27 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Jeremiah Foster said:
So it seems like there are two processes here; expulsion and deletion.
Expulsion is a political process, deletion is a technical process. One
entity may have authority over
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:05:21AM +0200, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
So it seems like there are two processes here; expulsion and
deletion. Expulsion is a political process, deletion is a technical
process. One entity may have authority over the expulsion and another
over the deletion. Am I right
On May 3, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:05:21AM +0200, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
So it seems like there are two processes here; expulsion and
deletion. Expulsion is a political process, deletion is a technical
process. One entity may have authority over
Hi!
On 03.05.2010 10:45, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
If that is not deemed to be clear enough or satisfactory, I'm happy to
clarify any additional doubt that people might have.
Thanks, this (and the following) indeed clarified my questions.
Best regards,
Alexander
PS: Sorry, didn't saw
rules that may be violated if necessary but we
would rather one did not.
2. General statements
- 1. Privilege
+ 1. Used abbreviations
+ o DSA - Debian Systems Administration Team
+ o DMUP - Debian Machine Usage Policy (this document
Wichert Akkerman - Debian project leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. Don't use Debian Facilities for unlawful activities, including, but
not limited to, software piracy.
Please do not use the term ``piracy.'' It is a loaded word that
compares sharing software to murdering people on the
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Wichert Akkerman - Debian project leader wrote:
Shell:
Please use ssh/scp if at all possible (check the copyright, it is not
free software, and there is no free replacement) rather than less
secure alternatives (rsh, telnet or FTP).
Current ssh on non-US is free...
Please use ssh/scp if at all possible (check the copyright, it is not
free software, and there is no free replacement) rather than less
secure alternatives (rsh, telnet or FTP).
You apparantly missed the great ssh rename...
Mike Stone
(not subscribed to -project)
pgpF8Tj0w1g89.pgp
Previously Michael Stone wrote:
You apparantly missed the great ssh rename...
It was actually written before that happened.. I'll update the text
to reflect that.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Generally uninteresting signature
* Wichert Akkerman - Debian project leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.3 Privacy
[...]
2.3 Used abbreviations
[...]
2.3, two times. I´d also put Used abbreviations as section 2.1,
because e.g. `DSA' is already used in section Privacy.
Cheers,
Colin
PS: I´m not subscribed to debian-project
15 matches
Mail list logo