-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08-04-2009 08:23, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
>> + Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200):
>>
>>> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> I'm just wondering if we should discuss more about the rules or
> if DSA will propose rules for adoption with some "migration
> period".
While I personally thing many of the debian.net entries are
questionable, I certainly don't want
* Peter Palfrader:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains
>>
>> Nico Golde used to autogenerate a list of debian.net domains, but it
>> was replaced with the wiki page for "privacy reasons".
>
> The list of .net entries is not publicly available - the
+ Peter Palfrader (Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:39:01 +0200):
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> > I'm just wondering if we should discuss more about the rules or
> > if DSA will propose rules for adoption with some "migration
> > period".
> While I personally thing many of
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Okay. Well, I’ve just put Daniel (owner of {git,backports}.debian.net)
> on CC
Thank you for making me aware of it, I've read through the thread now.
To summarise, there appears to be two seperated though related issues:
* that people (me) using a debian.net subdomain fo
On 2009-04-12, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> for the first issue, given that:
>
> * there has not been any 'confusions' about it known to me
> whetever some repository is on git.debian.org or git.debian.net,
I have unconfused other developers a few times.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:19:31PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Okay. Well, I’ve just put Daniel (owner of {git,backports}.debian.net)
> > on CC
>
> Thank you for making me aware of it, I've read through the thread now.
>
> To summarise, there appears to be two seperate
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:19:31PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> i don't see grounds to stop using the git.debian.net subdomain as i
> currently do.
>
> i don't see grounds to stop using the backports.debian.net subdomain as
> i currently do.
Well, I do. You are using generic .debian.net domain
* Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting
> > or maintaining stuff there at some point, but for the present it is
> > a bit easier for me to keep it all in a
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I think you mean backports.org, backports.debian.net is not what you
> > think it is. Despite its name, backports.d.n is a personal backports
> > archive for Daniel Bauman.
>
> I really don't get why it's appropriate for a developer to use such
> gene
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting
> > > or maintaining stuff there at some poi
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective
> project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter.
AOL.
Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian.org,
$X.debian.net should point to $X
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> (A reasonable exception could be www.debian.net containing a list of
> .debian.net names.)
There is a wiki page for that:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains
Nico Golde used to autogenerate a list of debian.net domains, but it
w
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains
>
> Nico Golde used to autogenerate a list of debian.net domains, but it
> was replaced with the wiki page for "privacy reasons".
The list of .net entries is not publicly available - the ldap only gives
it out to deb
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective
>> project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter.
>
> AOL.
>
> Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian
+ Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200):
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective
> >> project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter.
> > AOL.
>
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200):
>
> > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > >> Wouldn't it be just better to point those domains to the respective
> > >> project-wide effort
17 matches
Mail list logo
