Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting > > or maintaining stuff there at some point, but for the present it is > > a bit easier for me to keep it all in a

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > I think you mean backports.org, backports.debian.net is not what you > > think it is. Despite its name, backports.d.n is a personal backports > > archive for Daniel Bauman. > > I really don't get why it's appropriate for a developer to use such > gene

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting > > > or maintaining stuff there at some poi

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective > project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter. AOL. Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian.org, $X.debian.net should point to $X

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > (A reasonable exception could be www.debian.net containing a list of > .debian.net names.) There is a wiki page for that: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains Nico Golde used to autogenerate a list of debian.net domains, but it w

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-28 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote: > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains > > Nico Golde used to autogenerate a list of debian.net domains, but it > was replaced with the wiki page for "privacy reasons". The list of .net entries is not publicly available - the ldap only gives it out to deb

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-03-31 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: >> Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective >> project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter. > > AOL. > > Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-04-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200): > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > >> Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective > >> project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter. > > AOL. >

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)

2009-04-08 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > + Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200): > > > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > >> Wouldn't it be just better to point those domains to the respective > > >> project-wide effort