On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
a debate.
There is no debate here, just a bad suggestion from someone who has
been annoying Debian for years and is banned from the BTS control bot
due to this.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:38:31AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Please don't switch bugs.debian.org away from debbugs. I don't want to
have to leave the Debian project but some misguided folks doing that
would be one of the triggers for that.
Please don't threaten/ransom your labour to push one or
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 08:51:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up, our ITS definitely needs love. I
investigated the ITS team in 2010 and found it was already broken
(although one member disagreed with that assessment, qualifying the
team's status as fine). The most
Hi Lucas,
On 2013-10-09 01:58, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Here is my monthly report for September 2013 (+ the beginning of October).
Let's also use this opportunity to call for help on two key parts of our
infrastructure.
[...]
Call for help: debbugs developers
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
However, I am not convinced that development of bugs.debian.org should go
through Debbugs development. Unfortunately, I am not an ITS-s expert, and I
can't recommend a particular engine. There are many free ITS engines, some
of which
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
Please don't switch bugs.debian.org away from debbugs. I don't want to
have to leave the Debian project but some misguided folks doing that
would be one of the triggers for that. None of the other bug tracking
systems have anywhere near the amount of features
6 matches
Mail list logo
