also sprach Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.19.0827 +0100]:
paragraphs cut off because of the limits of the medium. (Pasting from
#-replies irc logs or from a live client? Per-candidate logfiles of
#-replies? Use of a text editor for collection / reformatting? Etc.)
I used the
[Helen Faulkner]
Having just run the 2005 DPL IRC debate (and a stressful experience it
was too), Martin Krafft and I would like to get feedback on what people
thought of the debate and how it was run.
Thank you, Helen and Martin, for a job well done.
I think the most useful thing would be a
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.16.1344 +0100]:
I found the first hour basically wasted time - the strength of IRC
is that it's real-time, while the form of the first hour of debate
did not really use that,
The goal of the first hour was to make sure
Hi,
I really liked the format of the debate, and I think that
despite the popularity of the second hour's free wheeling debate, the
structured first hour,along with carefully chosen questiosn, gives a
better idea of the candidates policies, and responses to unusual
scenarios. The
Hi All,
Having just run the 2005 DPL IRC debate (and a stressful experience it
was too), Martin Krafft and I would like to get feedback on what people
thought of the debate and how it was run.
Suggestions for future debates will be very welcome, not that I am
planning to volunteer to do that again
Helen, Martin - thanks for your effort.
I found the first hour basically wasted time - the strength of IRC is that
it's real-time, while the form of the first hour of debate did not really
use that, instead showing the weaknesses of IRC when text needs to be
copied pasted around :-) The
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:44:45PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
I found the first hour basically wasted time - the strength of IRC is that
it's real-time, while the form of the first hour of debate did not really
use that, instead showing the weaknesses of IRC when text needs to be
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:44:45PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
I found the first hour basically wasted time - the strength of IRC is that
it's real-time, while the form of the first hour of debate did not really
use that, instead showing the
Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:44:45PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
[...]
I haven't looked at any earlier IRC DPL candidate debates, so I can't
compare if this was better or worse.
Earler debates may have been easier due to the lower number of
participants.
I strongly suspect
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:28:25PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
I also liked the second part better. I could imagine a compromise in
the middle of both schemes, for something to replace the first part; I
don't know whether this is technically manageable, though. My
suggestion is that only one
10 matches
Mail list logo
