On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 19:30, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Em Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:46:57 +0300, Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escreveu:
their policies is deprecated here? If I say, I will only work for
organizations that endorse free software, would I be in conflict with
this
Hello,
I found no discussions on this topic I just came through... You may
find information about Sincere Choice here: http://www.sincerechoice.com/
it seems like a nice initiative... the only 'principle' helding
me is this one:
We assert that Open Source and Proprietary models can be used
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:37:04AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
it seems like a nice initiative... the only 'principle' helding
me is this one:
We assert that Open Source and Proprietary models can be used together
effectively. A number of our companies deploy software under the GPL
Freedom to Set Policy
Individual users, businesses, and government should all be free
to set their own policies regarding what sorts of software they
will acquire and use. They should not force their policies upon
others.
Sounds to me like they are
Em Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:33:35 -0400, Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Sounds to me like they are against, for example, a law that forces
government agencies to use only Open Source software. They would also be
against laws that force non-govt agencies to use one form of software or
Em Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:46:57 +0300, Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escreveu:
You mean the Social Contract's last paragraph? I don't think it's
Yes, sorry
In addition, our non-free section is still much more free than
the proprietary software referred to here. We're not distributing
6 matches
Mail list logo
