Scott James Remnant wrote:
>Can you provide a recent example? I've not seen any of this nature
>since the ftpmasters added to their numbers. I'm not an ftpmaster btw,
>I've just not seen any recent complaints of this nature recently.
In fact, I can't think of an example in the last 2 months offh
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:25:55PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:44:52PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 05:20, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > There have been repeated complaints that new packages sit in the NEW
> > > queue for inordinate amount
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:44:52PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 05:20, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > There have been repeated complaints that new packages sit in the NEW
> > queue for inordinate amounts of time with no feedback.
>
> Can you provide a recent example? I'v
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 05:20, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> There have been repeated complaints that new packages sit in the NEW queue
> for inordinate amounts of time with no feedback.
>
Can you provide a recent example? I've not seen any of this nature
since the ftpmasters added to their numbers.
There have been repeated complaints that new packages sit in the NEW queue
for inordinate amounts of time with no feedback.
There have been many other complaints about failure to act on the part of
the ftp masters.
There have been other complaints about lack of feedback from the ftp masters.
I
5 matches
Mail list logo
