also sprach Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org [2015-03-15 12:40 +0100]:
I agree that it should be possible to improve on identifying a
recurring, plannable, dependable income. But there hasn't been much
response to requests for help in the related areas. For example, I only
got one answer to the
also sprach Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org [2015-03-15 13:29 +0100]:
Wasn't it addressed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/02/msg00070.html ?
I am sorry, I have not been following every mail lately. Yes, this
looks spot-on. I'll reply there.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft
On 15/03/15 at 13:05 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org [2015-03-15 12:40 +0100]:
I agree that it should be possible to improve on identifying a
recurring, plannable, dependable income. But there hasn't been much
response to requests for help in the
[I've moved this over to debian-project and only bcc'd debian-vote]
The post I am replying to is
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2015/03/msg00033.html (and
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2015/03/msg00031.html), but
there's a sibling discussion going on at
On 15/03/15 at 11:28 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Our problem wrt money is IMHO that we don't have cash flow, i.e.
recurring, plannable, dependable income, which can be allocated to
budgets and necessary expenses, bypassing the substance which then
only serves as our backup.
The substance
5 matches
Mail list logo
