On 15273 March 1977, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Appeals to the DPL wouldn't be compatible with the current
version of our constitution.
That is sort-of orthogonal to whether they'd be a good idea or
not :) Yes, I see that the constitution specifically prohibits
the DPL from withdrawing the
Jonathan Wiltshire writes:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 11:26:01AM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
>> Ben Hutchings writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 11:26 -0700, Eldon Koyle wrote:
>> >> 5. There doesn't appear to be an appeals process (contact DAM?)
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > There is, since any
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:34 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 11:26:11AM -0700, Eldon Koyle wrote:
> > I think there are many who are concerned about the process, not the CoC
> > itself. Here are the main concerns as I see them (at least from the few
> > who
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 11:26:11AM -0700, Eldon Koyle wrote:
> I think there are many who are concerned about the process, not the CoC
> itself. Here are the main concerns as I see them (at least from the few
> who have come forward), and I believe these are the reasons that people
> are
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 11:26:01AM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 11:26 -0700, Eldon Koyle wrote:
> >> 5. There doesn't appear to be an appeals process (contact DAM?)
> > [...]
> >
> > There is, since any decision by the DPL or a delegate can
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 10:57:00PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> In my opinion, all kinds of decisions should be done
> by a team that has the delegation to do them - DAM. Nobody else.
The only delegated power available to DAM is to rule on who is a member of
the project - nothing more, nothing
On 1/3/19 9:39 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The anti-harassment team is the usual contact point for complaints and
> can recommend actions to the DAMs (or other teams) but doesn't have
> delegated powers (as I understand it).
With
99662c15 ยท Remove Norbert Preining (anti-harassment team
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 11:26 -0700, Eldon Koyle wrote:
>> 5. There doesn't appear to be an appeals process (contact DAM?)
> [...]
>
> There is, since any decision by the DPL or a delegate can be overridden
> by General Resolution.
This isn't really an appeals process in
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 11:26 -0700, Eldon Koyle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:25 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> > For those trying to undermine it with statements like "I'm worried
> > I'll be thrown out of Debian if I make a single mistake", please give
> > it a rest already.
Hi all,
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:25 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> For those trying to undermine it with statements like "I'm worried
> I'll be thrown out of Debian if I make a single mistake", please give
> it a rest already. These are basic principles on how we want all
> people to interact.
Hey folks,
We've been having some very tense discussions in various fora lately,
and it's striking that yet again we seem to be re-hashing arguments
about having a Code of Conduct [1], and enforcing it. It's massively
draining, and should not be necessary.
Fundamentally, I don't believe the
11 matches
Mail list logo
