Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden in June last year, in: ... Would you care to tell us why? Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: But since we did have a delegation for almost two years now, [...] (Err, 23 June 2005 to 24th Oct 2006 is 16 months, which doesn't really make almost two years) Cheers, aj signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Kalle! * Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 14:03]: Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be effective. And PGP/GPG signed but I'm in the

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by a GR, or by the technical committee. 6. Technical committee I think you're mistaken, and

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden in June last year, in: ... Would you care to tell us why? Simple to answer - Manoj has a different opinion about

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Wuertele
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au [2006-10-25 12:49]: I won't be looking into formally creating a new delegation 'til after etch has released, at which point I hope we can find at least four people who'll be active in maintaining policy according to the policy process we've had for quite

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be effective. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Debian Project Secretary
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:34:49 +1000, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au said: On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by a GR, or by the

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-25 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:50:57PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote: Interesting date Joerg. :-) On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden in June last year,

Policy delegation

2006-10-24 Thread Anthony Towns
Hi, I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden in June last year, in: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html That leaves debian-policy maintained by subscribers to the debian-policy mailing list, according to the process described by

Re: Policy delegation

2006-10-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:29:48 +1000, Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi, I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden in June last year, in: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html That leaves debian-policy maintained by