On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden
in June last year, in:
...
Would you care to tell us why?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
But since we did have a delegation for almost two years now, [...]
(Err, 23 June 2005 to 24th Oct 2006 is 16 months, which doesn't really make
almost two years)
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Kalle!
* Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-25 14:03]:
Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the
Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be
effective.
And PGP/GPG signed but I'm in the
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical
policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by a
GR, or by the technical committee. 6. Technical committee
I think you're mistaken, and
On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden
in June last year, in:
...
Would you care to tell us why?
Simple to answer - Manoj has a different opinion about
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au [2006-10-25 12:49]:
I won't be looking into formally creating a new delegation 'til after
etch has released, at which point I hope we can find at least four
people who'll be active in maintaining policy according to the policy
process we've had for quite
Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the
Do note that such proposals need to be sent to debian-vote to be
effective.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:34:49 +1000, Anthony Towns
aj@azure.humbug.org.au said:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:47PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Given that there is no delegated power to change the technical
policy, I can only see that the technical policy may be changed by
a GR, or by the
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:50:57PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10818 March 1977, Michael Meskes wrote:
Interesting date Joerg. :-)
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:29:48AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden
in June last year,
Hi,
I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made by Branden
in June last year, in:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html
That leaves debian-policy maintained by subscribers to the debian-policy
mailing list, according to the process described by
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:29:48 +1000, Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi, I'm withdrawing the Package Policy Committee delegation made
by Branden in June last year, in:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html
That leaves debian-policy maintained by
11 matches
Mail list logo