On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, David Nusinow wrote:
> > That's also the logic of my proposal of having more "polls":
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/02/msg00065.html
> > (just ignore the "social pressure" idea also elaborated in the same mail,
> > it's definitely not a good one)
>
> The prob
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:24:55AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, David Nusinow wrote:
> > system of governance take over." Fundamentally, this could have happened at
> > any time with any of the problematic discussions of the past, but it didn't
> > because no developer stepp
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, David Nusinow wrote:
> system of governance take over." Fundamentally, this could have happened at
> any time with any of the problematic discussions of the past, but it didn't
> because no developer stepped up to make this decision.
And because a full-fledge GR is a lot of wo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:29:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
My question, finally, to all candidates, is this: do you feel that
this is within the practical boundaries and limitations of the DPL's
office, and do you think that this semi-official responsibility would
facilitate overcoming the
(Note: The following is cross-posted to -vote and -project. Please follow
up on topics related to the role of the DPL to -project. Follow up on
topics related to the DPL election on -vote. Thanks!)
Hi everyone,
One of the major problems the project has faced is the inability to take
a stand on
5 matches
Mail list logo
