Jim Westveer writes:
>
> On 03-Aug-2000 Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Dale Scheetz writes:
> >
> > > I just can't understand the reluctance to satisfy this requirement
> > except
> > > that it is viewed by some as being too hard. I cannot, for the life of
> > me,
> >
> > You've not bee
On 03-Aug-2000 Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Dale Scheetz writes:
>
> > I just can't understand the reluctance to satisfy this requirement except
> > that it is viewed by some as being too hard. I cannot, for the life of me,
>
> You've not been reading my emails then. I don't want random people
> ha
> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated
> that I do infact, possess that private key.
Well indeed, but I'd expect to get a gpg-signed mail from my applicant
as part of step 2, and I could then check the signature.
Matthew
--
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Em
On 30-Jul-2000 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi Jim!
>
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
>
>> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated
>> that I do infact, possess that private key.
>
> IIRC, it was required that you sign your application with the
> key. I don't know whe
Hi Jim!
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated
> that I do infact, possess that private key.
IIRC, it was required that you sign your application with the
key. I don't know wheter this is still true however.
Previously Jim Westveer wrote:
> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated
> that I do infact, possess that private key.
Signing an arbitrary something proves that just as well. For example
a package, the output of fortune, etc.
Wichert.
--
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 11:18:33AM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote:
>
> It seems that something is left out of the proposal to not
> require an ID (or anything else) signed by the applicant.
>
> As an example, I could acquire from db.d.o a public key for
> someone that is signed by a maintainer. (key
I am, admitadly a crypto mental midget, So feel free to
blast me if I am way off base.
It seems that something is left out of the proposal to not
require an ID (or anything else) signed by the applicant.
As an example, I could acquire from db.d.o a public key for
someone that is signed by a
8 matches
Mail list logo
