[moving to debian-project]
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 06:24:37PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> --- Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 05:28:22PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> > > --- tluxt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think it would be an excellent idea to have a debian-user-woo
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:39:32PM +0200, Chris Halls wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 05:28:22PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> > > > I think it would be an excellent idea to have a
> > > > debian-user-woody list.
> > > >
> > > > The debian-testing is for developers.
I thought that was anything but t
FYI, debian-testing is NOT for developers.
This list was created for the testing group started during the release of
1.3. Most of the members at that time were Debian users, and not
developers. The whole point was to get users involved in testing.
Developers said they were already testing on their
--- Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, debian-testing is NOT for developers.
Hmm...
If that is true then perhaps it would be a good idea
to update some part of the following to be more accurate, correct, or
informative.
http://lists.debian.org/devel.html
"This is an index of mailing
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:25:52PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> > FYI, debian-testing is NOT for developers.
>
> Hmm...
>
> If that is true then perhaps it would be a good idea to update some part
> of the following to be more accurate, correct, or informative.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/devel.html
>
--- Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:25:52PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> > > FYI, debian-testing is NOT for developers.
> >
> > Hmm...
> >
> > If that is true then perhaps it would be a good idea to update some part
> > of the following to be more accurate, correct, o
tluxt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
>
> In fact, I'm wondering: _does_ it have a speific purpose today?
Currently it is used as a place to report successful installation of
testing distribution.
If there was a successful report of an installation there for an arch,
that architecture
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:41:50AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> FYI, debian-testing is NOT for developers.
>
> This list was created for the testing group started during the release of
> 1.3. Most of the members at that time were Debian users, and not
> developers. The whole point was to get users
--- Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think both would be best :-) i.e. more people helping the testing
> group, and a new list for people who are running testing/unstable and
> asking questions on debian-user.
I agree.
> Yes, we need more people to help do the work of the testing grou
(Update, adding "-user" in four places to correct & clarify.)
--- Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think both would be best :-) i.e. more people helping the testing
> group, and a new list for people who are running testing/unstable and
> asking questions on debian-user.
I agree.
> Y
Why not use the word beta in the new list name? That applies to frozen or
what we are wishing would be frozen. Some combination of the words debian,
user and beta would work and it won't sound like debian-testing at all.
pw
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why not use the word beta in the new list name? That applies to frozen or
> what we are wishing would be frozen. Some combination of the words debian,
> user and beta would work and it won't sound like debian-testing at all.
Thank you for your suggestion! :)
I do no
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, tluxt wrote:
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why not use the word beta in the new list name? That applies to frozen or
> > what we are wishing would be frozen. Some combination of the words debian,
> > user and beta would work and it won't sound like debian-testing at all.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, tluxt wrote:
>
> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Why not use the word beta in the new list name? That applies to frozen or
> > > what we are wishing would be frozen. Some combination of the words debian,
> > > user and beta would work and it
Hi tluxt!
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, tluxt wrote:
> Actually, the more I think about what such a list should be about,
> and what it's name should be, the more I think we should have two lists:
>
> debian-woody-user
> debian-sid-user
It should be
debian-user-woody
debian-user-sid
_or_
debian-u
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:30:34AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> It should be
> debian-user-woody
> debian-user-sid
> _or_
> debian-user-testing
> debian-user-unstable
> if anything at all (I don't comment on the necessity as I don't read
> -user currently).
>
> The latter two having th
tluxt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, tluxt wrote:
> >
> > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Why not use the word beta in the new list name? That applies to frozen
> > > > or
> > > > what we are wishing would be frozen. Some combination of
Just one comment on choosing names:
If we use names like woody or potato in a mailing list name we are using
names which will eventually go out of use. That is the reason I suggested
using the beta word. It denotes that the list is not for users of the
current stable release, but the closest thing
18 matches
Mail list logo
