On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:55:07AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> - the use of the debian.org addresses is a strong way for people to show
> that they are doing things on behalf of Debian,
This. I don't think we should drop @debian.org email addresses for that reason.
--
Could you people please
On 15/11/17 12:53, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Someone who was sort-of-MIA said on -private that they would like to
> keep their @debian.org email forwarding indefinitely, as they move to
> emeritus status.
One alternative that wasn't mentioned in this thread: what if Debian
stops providing @debian.org
]] Ondřej Surý
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, at 23:01, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Ian Jackson
> >
> > > I think that, with some safeguards[1], this would be a good thing to
> > > offer people. If nothing else people have often used @d.o addresses
> > > in Debian work, where the addresses live on
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, at 23:01, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Ian Jackson
>
> > I think that, with some safeguards[1], this would be a good thing to
> > offer people. If nothing else people have often used @d.o addresses
> > in Debian work, where the addresses live on after they move on, and we
>
]] Ian Jackson
> I think that, with some safeguards[1], this would be a good thing to
> offer people. If nothing else people have often used @d.o addresses
> in Debian work, where the addresses live on after they move on, and we
> should definitely encourage even an emeritus member to be
Enrico Zini dijo [Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:46:52PM +0100]:
> I would be ok with saying that emeritus people who have a valid gpg key
> can still have email forwarding, exporting the emeritus keyring
> alongside the other keyrings, and handling email forwarding
> configuration changes via
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 07:23:23AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Is this because of it being hard to track the contributions of
> non-uploading DDs?
Not necessarily (but probably true for some case, for example, those we
got DD_nu because of relevant contributions to the debconf orga, that's
not
I think if we can find a way to manage it technically, allowing people
to forward email would be a reasonable thing to do.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> non-uploading DD where the MIA team is not looking at.
Is this because of it being hard to track the contributions of
non-uploading DDs?
Is the MIA team looking at contributors.d.o data?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hello Mattia,
On Wed, Nov 15 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> IMHO if somebody care to keep their forward email usable they can very
> well care enough to have a robust enough key and keep it in the
> keyring, and possibly be demoted to non-uploading DD where the MIA
> team is not looking at.
I'd
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:45:52PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> In many cases (such this particular one) people don't have a viable gpg
> key anymore in the keyring: that means they can't email
> chan...@db.debian.org to update their LDAP details (theoretically, they
> might still know the LDAP
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:08:41PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It would be possible to have an "emeritus" keyring, I guess. Since it
> would only be used for email forwarding and a few other things, it
> could have weaker security requirements.
Techinically such keyring exists, but they are not
Peter Palfrader writes ("Re: Emeritus status, and email forwarding"):
> Without a key in a keyring that somebody maintains, authenticating such
> requests, even manually, is going to be a PITA.
Mattia Rizzolo writes ("Re: Emeritus status, and email forwardi
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:53:18AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Unfortunately it would mean that such people would still need some
> > kind of login on Debian systems, so that they could update the email
> > forwarding. But it wouldn't have to have
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:53:18AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Unfortunately it would mean that such people would still need some
kind of login on Debian systems, so that they could update the email
forwarding. But it wouldn't have to have the wide powers of an active
DD/DM account.
Unless this
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:53:18AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Unfortunately it would mean that such people would still need some
> kind of login on Debian systems, so that they could update the email
> forwarding.
In many cases (such this particular one) people don't have a viable gpg
key
16 matches
Mail list logo
