On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:44:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
we are short before the release and I wonder how it would be possible to
contribute to the release notes.
There's a pseudo-package in the BTS for collecting contributions:
http://bugs.debian.org/release-notes
As for formats and repos
Hi,
we are short before the release and I wonder how it would be possible to
contribute to the release notes. I have drafted (not finished) some
text for the Debian Med Blend[1] which is to long for the general notes
and thus will be delivered via other channels. However, I would love to
see
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
Could you also update dak's README to point to:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/git/dak.git
instead of the obsolete bzr repo?
Last time I asked it was still in use for the arch specific package
list. I could probably add a README, but moving it
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 10:27:20 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
Could you also update dak's README to point to:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/git/dak.git
instead of the obsolete bzr repo?
Last time I asked it was still in use for the arch
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 10:27:20 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
Could you also update dak's README to point to:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/git/dak.git
instead of the obsolete bzr repo?
(Re obsolete cvs repositories on gluck aka cvs.d.o)
(if you got BCCed, congratulations, you are in one of the affected cvs groups.)
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[debbugs]
Don responded, it moved to bzr: http://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Debbugs
Hi,
Could you also update dak's README to point to:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/git/dak.git
instead of the obsolete bzr repo?
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
I need information where
debbugs
Don responded, it moved to bzr: http://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Debbugs
debian-openoffice
$ apt-cache showsrc openoffice.org | grep Vcs
Vcs-Bzr:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05/10/2008):
http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?root=debian-doc
This link is wrong. DDP uses SVN nowadays.
Question is: why
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Question is: why is that still available?
Probably because nobody bothers to tell DSA when services are no longer
required.
There are still 2 users of cvs.debian.org (webwml, dak/srcdep), otherwise
I would have requested it to go away.
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
I need information where debbugs,
http://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/
moved to, similar to what is available from the READMEs in
/srv/cvs.debian.org/cvs/qa. Can you provide that?
Sorry for not telling anyone about that.
Don Armstrong
--
A
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05/10/2008):
http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?root=debian-doc
This link is wrong. DDP uses SVN nowadays.
Question is: why is that still available?
Probably because nobody bothers
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?root=debian-doc
This link is wrong. DDP uses SVN nowadays.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05/10/2008):
http://cvs.debian.org/ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/?root=debian-doc
This link is wrong. DDP uses SVN nowadays.
Question is: why is that still available? I assume CVS to SVN conversion
kept history. And if it didn't, that site might get a BFW
Sorry Keith and all others for the noise, I'll try to not read my mails
when I am tired next time.
The release notes have a pseudo-packages. You can browse some of its
issues on our bug tracking system, or contact directly its maintainer
for your very good question. Lastly, it seems that its
On Thursday 20 October 2005 04.36, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the 2.2 is written here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/
the following :
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has been obsoleted by Debian GNU/Linux 3.0
(woody). Security
El jue, 20-10-2005 a las 21:32 +0200, Adrian von Bidder escribió:
On Thursday 20 October 2005 04.36, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the 2.2 is written here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/
the following :
Debian GNU/Linux
17 matches
Mail list logo
