On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:19, Michael Banck wrote:
> On December 17th, 2006, Aurelien Jarno wrote on his blog:
> > As [EMAIL PROTECTED] is everything but responsive (well if you can
> > assign a level of responsiveness to /dev/null), I have decided to act.
> > I have installed QEMU on an 8-w
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Running rogue autobuilders does not help Debian in the long term, and
> will only lead to useless tension. The best way to help a lagging port
Running rogue autobuilders as you put it has saved a couple of
architectures and unstuck t
Michael Banck a écrit :
> Running rogue autobuilders does not help Debian in the long term, and
> will only lead to useless tension. The best way to help a lagging port
> is to identify arch-specific build failures which need real porting (and
and packages never uploaded, packages never
uild data-base and the
buildd admins.
Running rogue autobuilders does not help Debian in the long term, and
will only lead to useless tension. The best way to help a lagging port
is to identify arch-specific build failures which need real porting (and
are not just dep-waits) and tackle those, IMHO (I
4 matches
Mail list logo