Re: Social Committee proposal text (diff), updated

2007-06-06 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I see little to support the notion of a) preemptive action b) private interventions being something the community would instantly start preferring. Maybe it should. In social disagreements the fastest way to resolve problems is if the problem is privately

Re: Social Committee proposal text (diff), updated

2007-06-05 Thread Ian Jackson
Josip Rodin writes (Social Committee proposal text (diff), updated): [stuff] Josip's proposal is radically different from mine in two orthogonal ways. The first one, which we have been arguing about a bit so far, is that he proposes that we establish the SC as a constitutional body. However

Re: Social Committee proposal text (diff), updated

2007-06-05 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:38:24PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: * Josip models the SC's powers on those of the TC. This is wholly inappropriate because the questions that the SC is required to deal with are very different. I guess it doesn't make sense to argue much about this, but I have

Social Committee proposal text (diff), updated

2007-06-04 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I went back and examined the thread that started with Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in February, and came up with the following diff at the Constitution. The changes from the last version include: * replaced the somewhat confusing 'day-to-day' reference * added section 'Intervene in