On 15-Jun-00, 23:06 (CDT), John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 13-Jun-00, 01:57 (CDT), John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > non-free systems), I do not see what is "unforgivable" about opposing
> > a resolution that asks our users t
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 13-Jun-00, 01:57 (CDT), John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ...Nor did I say that it is not useful simply because I did not use
> > it. Nor, I think, did anyone else support my position on those
> > grounds, although plenty supported t
On 13-Jun-00, 01:57 (CDT), John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Nor did I say that it is not useful simply because I did not use
> it. Nor, I think, did anyone else support my position on those
> grounds, although plenty supported the opposition on the grounds that
> they personally use
On 13 Jun 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
> > John has said that non-free has ceased to be useful based on the fact that
> > he doesn't actually make use of it, and many others agreed with this
> > assesement. So here is a slightly different perspective.
> Jason, you are so badly distorting my posi
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John has said that non-free has ceased to be useful based on the fact that
> he doesn't actually make use of it, and many others agreed with this
> assesement. So here is a slightly different perspective.
Jason, you are so badly distorting my positi
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The numbers: (non-free + contrib = total)
> [ prior to this point I have no record I non-free stuff, I do not recall
> if it existed or not. ]
> bo: 69 + 0 = 67 (combined non-free/contrib)
> hamm: 183 + 78 = 261
> slink: 225 + 77 = 302
> potato: 236 + 1
[snip]
>> reason alone. In particular I'd like to see a little consideration for
>> some of the more diverse groups that are serviced by non-free
[anyone else
>> notice how many Asian fonts are in there?].
[snip]
>For the record, the most of Japanese fonts related packages are
>DFSG c
Hi.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
at Sat, 10 Jun 2000 20:50:13 -0600 (MDT),
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In fact, the download ratios don't seem to have changed much since the
> last time this came up, still about 5-6% of all downloads from
> ftp.debian.org are for non-free
John has said that non-free has ceased to be useful based on the fact that
he doesn't actually make use of it, and many others agreed with this
assesement. So here is a slightly different perspective.
I have gone back and counted the number of packages in the non-free
sections in debian, if Joh
9 matches
Mail list logo
