On 2004-02-23 15:43:21 + Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And trust me, you probably don't want to see the emails that
are getting blocked
No, hence "summaries of". If we start seeing 99 messages from one
sender with an ostensibly sensible subject are blocked, someone may
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:32:40PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-02-23 13:49:58 + Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Should we handle this technically by blocking further posts from
> >abusers, as the listmasters proposed?
>
> Blocking or further moderation only if periodic summar
On 2004-02-23 13:49:58 + Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should we handle this technically by blocking further posts from
abusers, as the listmasters proposed?
Blocking or further moderation only if periodic summaries of refused
posts, including sender addresses, were made to an
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 07:41:22PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The point I was trying to make is that you (listmasters) would have your
> priorities slightly reversed if you cared much more about a GPG-signed
> message in a moderated mailing list for being off-topic than about the
> hundreds of s
4 matches
Mail list logo
