Re: Status Debian Etch and LSB 3.1

2007-11-01 Thread Jeff Licquia
Fernando Ike de Oliveira wrote: Ok. The first step would be to test again? I can do it and report debian-lsb, right? Yup, that would be a start. Is the process for LSB Certification is complex? My employer is very interested in to help. It's much better than it used to be. Here's a

Re: Status Debian Etch and LSB 3.1

2007-11-01 Thread Fernando Ike de Oliveira
Em Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:06:25 -0400 Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > Yes; I was working on Debian's certification, but got bogged down in > other issues. > > In the meantime, there was an obscure X library issue that appeared > in an etch update. I have yet to track down the issu

Re: Status Debian Etch and LSB 3.1

2007-10-31 Thread Jeff Licquia
Fernando Ike de Oliveira wrote: Hi Folks, I looked LSB Distribution Status of the LSB page[1] and there is written that the Debian Etch is as planned to LSB 3.1, but I remember that the Etch was launched[2] as compatible with LSB 3.1. Change status to "certified" is easy? And as I can

Status Debian Etch and LSB 3.1

2007-10-31 Thread Fernando Ike de Oliveira
Hi Folks, I looked LSB Distribution Status of the LSB page[1] and there is written that the Debian Etch is as planned to LSB 3.1, but I remember that the Etch was launched[2] as compatible with LSB 3.1. Change status to "certified" is easy? And as I can help it? =) 1 - http://www.li

Status Debian Etch and LSB 3.1

2007-10-31 Thread Fernando Ike de Oliveira
Hi Folks, I looked LSB Distribution Status of the LSB page[1] and there is written that the Debian Etch is as planned to LSB 3.1, but I remember that the Etch was launched[2] as compatible with LSB 3.1. Change status to "certified" is easy? And as I can help it? =) 1 - http://www.li